Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) vs TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO)
TKO leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though OMC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Omnicom Group Inc. and TKO Group Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
$71.35Communication Services
TKO
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
$198.78Communication Services
Total return — OMC vs TKO
growth of $100 · last 27yOMC +96.7%TKO +687.2%TKO compounded faster
OMC TKO
OMC vs TKO: by the numbers
- •OMC is the larger company ($20.34B vs $14.90B market cap).
- •OMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (66.06 vs 72.82 P/E).
- •TKO converts more revenue to profit (4.47% vs 0.32% net margin).
- •TKO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.20% vs 8.49% CAGR).
- •OMC pays the higher dividend yield (4.34% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, OMC or TKO?
Metric tally: OMC 7 · TKO 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueOMC(lower P/E)
GrowthTKO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeOMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityTKO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | OMC | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 66.06● | 72.82 |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.50 |
| P/S ratio | 0.74● | 7.64 |
| P/B ratio | 1.55● | 11.46 |
| PEG ratio | 2.89 | 0.05● |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.11● | 28.69 |
| FCF yield | 20.45%● | 4.52% |
Profitability
| Metric | OMC | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 16.76% | 51.53%● |
| Operating margin | 13.70% | 20.04%● |
| Net margin | 0.32% | 4.47%● |
| ROE | 0.67% | 6.70%● |
| ROIC | 1.48% | 6.17%● |
Dividends
| Metric | OMC | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.34%● | 1.56% |
| Payout ratio | — | 128.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | OMC | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.49% | 37.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.36%● | 2.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.43% | 31.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.90% | 28.92%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, OMC or TKO?
- It depends on your goal. value: OMC (lower P/E); growth: TKO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: OMC (higher dividend yield); quality: TKO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TKO leads 9 to 7.
- Is OMC or TKO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, OMC is cheaper: OMC trades at a 66.06 P/E and TKO at 72.82.
- Which has grown faster, OMC or TKO?
- Over the past five years, TKO grew revenue faster — OMC at a 8.49% CAGR versus TKO at 37.20%.
- Does OMC or TKO pay a bigger dividend?
- OMC yields 4.34% and TKO yields 1.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is OMC or TKO more profitable?
- TKO runs the higher net margin — OMC at 0.32% versus TKO at 4.47%.
- Which has been the better investment, OMC or TKO?
- Over the past 10-year, TKO delivered the higher annualized total return — OMC at 2.21% versus TKO at 28.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Omnicom P/E ratioTKO Group P/E ratioOmnicom dividend yieldTKO Group dividend yieldOmnicom ROETKO Group ROEOmnicom operating marginTKO Group operating marginOmnicom revenue growthTKO Group revenue growthOmnicom free cash flowTKO Group free cash flow
Omnicom & TKO Group appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.