Which has grown faster, OMC or SATS?

Over the past five years, SATS grew revenue faster — OMC at a 8.49% CAGR versus SATS at 50.70%.

Does OMC or SATS pay a bigger dividend?

OMC pays a dividend (4.07% yield) while SATS does not currently pay one.

Is OMC or SATS more profitable?

OMC runs the higher net margin — OMC at 0.32% versus SATS at -97.56%.

Which has been the better investment, OMC or SATS?

Over the past 10-year, SATS delivered the higher annualized total return — OMC at 3.16% versus SATS at 9.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) vs EchoStar Corporation (SATS)

OMC leads on 9 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Omnicom Group Inc. and EchoStar Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 4, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

OMC

Omnicom Group Inc.

$22.41B

$78.62Communication Services

SATS

EchoStar Corporation

$29.26B

$101.50Communication Services

Total return — OMC vs SATS

growth of $100 · last 18y

OMC +69.5%SATS +211.4%SATS compounded faster

OMC SATS

OMC vs SATS: by the numbers

•SATS is the larger company ($29.26B vs $22.41B market cap).
•OMC is profitable (0.32% net margin) while SATS runs a net loss (-97.56%).
•SATS grew revenue faster over the past five years (50.70% vs 8.49% CAGR).
•OMC pays a dividend (4.07% yield) while SATS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, OMC or SATS?

Metric tally: OMC 9 · SATS 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSATS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityOMC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	OMC	SATS
P/E ratio	72.80	—
P/S ratio	0.81●	1.98
P/B ratio	1.71●	5.21
PEG ratio	2.89	—
EV / EBITDA	7.52●	36.08
FCF yield	18.55%	—

Profitability

Metric	OMC	SATS
Gross margin	16.76%	27.08%●
Operating margin	13.70%●	2.19%
Net margin	0.32%●	-97.56%
ROE	0.67%●	-256.45%
ROIC	1.48%●	-0.18%

Dividends

Metric	OMC	SATS
Dividend yield	4.07%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	OMC	SATS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.49%	50.70%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	4.36%●	-12.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.43%●	5.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.05%	33.14%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, OMC or SATS?: It depends on your goal. growth: SATS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: OMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, OMC leads 9 to 3.
Which has grown faster, OMC or SATS?: Over the past five years, SATS grew revenue faster — OMC at a 8.49% CAGR versus SATS at 50.70%.
Does OMC or SATS pay a bigger dividend?: OMC pays a dividend (4.07% yield) while SATS does not currently pay one.
Is OMC or SATS more profitable?: OMC runs the higher net margin — OMC at 0.32% versus SATS at -97.56%.
Which has been the better investment, OMC or SATS?: Over the past 10-year, SATS delivered the higher annualized total return — OMC at 3.16% versus SATS at 9.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full OMC analysis Full SATS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Omnicom P/E ratio EchoStar P/E ratio Omnicom dividend yield EchoStar dividend yield Omnicom ROE EchoStar ROE Omnicom operating margin EchoStar operating margin Omnicom revenue growth EchoStar revenue growth Omnicom free cash flow EchoStar free cash flow

Omnicom & EchoStar appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 4, 2026.