NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)
NVDA leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though XOM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — NVDA vs XOM
growth of $100 · last 27yNVDA +500157.2%XOM +311.9%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NVDA XOM
NVDA vs XOM: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $609.33B market cap).
- •XOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.79 vs 31.42 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 7.76% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •XOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.78% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, NVDA or XOM?
Metric tally: NVDA 10 · XOM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueXOM(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeXOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NVDA | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.42 | 24.79● |
| Forward P/E | 16.44 | 14.15● |
| P/S ratio | 19.74 | 1.89● |
| P/B ratio | 25.60 | 2.42● |
| PEG ratio | 0.57● | 2.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.96 | 10.82● |
| FCF yield | 2.38% | 3.06%● |
Profitability
| Metric | NVDA | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 74.15%● | 25.49% |
| Operating margin | 64.02%● | 9.01% |
| Net margin | 62.97%● | 7.76% |
| ROE | 81.65%● | 9.95% |
| ROIC | 62.88%● | 6.34% |
Dividends
| Metric | NVDA | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.01% | 2.78%● |
| Payout ratio | 0.61% | 61.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NVDA | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 68.23%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 85.78%● | 12.08% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 85.52%● | 36.20% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 63.05%● | 23.23% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NVDA or XOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: XOM (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: XOM (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 10 to 7.
- Is NVDA or XOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, XOM is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and XOM at 24.79.
- Which has grown faster, NVDA or XOM?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus XOM at 12.49%.
- Does NVDA or XOM pay a bigger dividend?
- NVDA yields 0.01% and XOM yields 2.78% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NVDA or XOM more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus XOM at 7.76%.
- Which has been the better investment, NVDA or XOM?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus XOM at 9.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
NVIDIA P/E ratioExxon Mobil P/E ratioNVIDIA dividend yieldExxon Mobil dividend yieldNVIDIA ROEExxon Mobil ROENVIDIA operating marginExxon Mobil operating marginNVIDIA revenue growthExxon Mobil revenue growthNVIDIA free cash flowExxon Mobil free cash flow
NVIDIA & Exxon Mobil appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.