Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) vs Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
NTR leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Nutrien Ltd. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
$64.57Basic Materials
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$110.65Basic Materials
Total return — NTR vs WPM
growth of $100 · last 9yNTR +21.9%WPM +386.2%WPM compounded faster
NTR WPM
NTR vs WPM: by the numbers
- •WPM is the larger company ($50.25B vs $31.00B market cap).
- •NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.60 vs 27.17 P/E).
- •WPM converts more revenue to profit (65.55% vs 8.58% net margin).
- •WPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.70% vs 5.38% CAGR).
- •NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.30% vs 0.72%).
Which is better, NTR or WPM?
Metric tally: NTR 9 · WPM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTR(lower P/E)
GrowthWPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)
QualityWPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NTR | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.60● | 27.17 |
| Forward P/E | 12.00● | 20.27 |
| P/S ratio | 1.16● | 17.82 |
| P/B ratio | 1.27● | 5.28 |
| PEG ratio | 0.05● | 0.20 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.15● | 20.54 |
| FCF yield | 6.94%● | 2.03% |
Profitability
| Metric | NTR | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.16% | 77.10%● |
| Operating margin | 14.15% | 71.81%● |
| Net margin | 8.58% | 65.55%● |
| ROE | 9.46% | 19.41%● |
| ROIC | 6.79% | 15.60%● |
Dividends
| Metric | NTR | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.30%● | 0.72% |
| Payout ratio | 46.41% | 23.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NTR | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.38% | 18.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 41.02%● | 22.63% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.42% | 8.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.79% | 21.17%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NTR or WPM?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: WPM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: WPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 9 to 8.
- Is NTR or WPM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: NTR trades at a 13.60 P/E and WPM at 27.17.
- Which has grown faster, NTR or WPM?
- Over the past five years, WPM grew revenue faster — NTR at a 5.38% CAGR versus WPM at 18.70%.
- Does NTR or WPM pay a bigger dividend?
- NTR yields 3.30% and WPM yields 0.72% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NTR or WPM more profitable?
- WPM runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.58% versus WPM at 65.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, NTR or WPM?
- Over the past 5-year, WPM delivered the higher annualized total return — NTR at 5.79% versus WPM at 16.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nutrien P/E ratioWheaton Precious Metals P/E ratioNutrien dividend yieldWheaton Precious Metals dividend yieldNutrien ROEWheaton Precious Metals ROENutrien operating marginWheaton Precious Metals operating marginNutrien revenue growthWheaton Precious Metals revenue growthNutrien free cash flowWheaton Precious Metals free cash flow
Nutrien & Wheaton Precious Metals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.