Which has the lower trailing P/E, NTR or SQM?

NTR has the lower trailing P/E: NTR trades at 16.25 and SQM at 16.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, NTR or SQM?

Over the past five years, SQM grew revenue faster — NTR at a 4.39% CAGR versus SQM at 26.46%.

Does NTR or SQM pay a bigger dividend?

NTR yields 2.73% and SQM yields 1.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NTR or SQM more profitable?

SQM runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.44% versus SQM at 20.61%.

How have NTR and SQM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, NTR delivered 9.02% and SQM delivered 15.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) vs Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM)

A side-by-side comparison of Nutrien Ltd. and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NTR

Nutrien Ltd.

$38.54B

$80.28Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:20 PM EDT

SQM

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.

$22.86B

$80.02Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:20 PM EDT

Total return — NTR vs SQM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

NTR +97.8% (+7.9%/yr)SQM +88.3% (+7.3%/yr)NTR compounded faster over this window

NTR SQM

NTR vs SQM: by the numbers

•NTR is the larger company ($38.54B vs $22.86B market cap).
•NTR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.25 vs 16.70 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SQM converts more revenue to profit (20.61% vs 8.44% net margin).
•SQM grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.46% vs 4.39% CAGR).
•NTR pays the higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 1.25%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NTR	SQM
P/E ratio	16.25	16.70
Forward P/E	15.99	11.90
P/S ratio	1.37	3.44
P/B ratio	1.49	3.69
EV / EBITDA	7.70	8.50
FCF yield	5.48%	8.39%

Profitability

Metric	NTR	SQM
Gross margin	31.02%	29.32%
Operating margin	14.69%	24.83%
Net margin	8.44%	20.61%
ROE	9.19%	22.09%
ROIC	7.19%	11.60%

Dividends

Metric	NTR	SQM
Dividend yield	2.73%	1.25%
Payout ratio	46.20%	49.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NTR	SQM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.39%	26.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	41.02%	27.15%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.80%	27.23%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	12.82%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, NTR or SQM?: NTR has the lower trailing P/E: NTR trades at 16.25 and SQM at 16.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, NTR or SQM?: Over the past five years, SQM grew revenue faster — NTR at a 4.39% CAGR versus SQM at 26.46%.
Does NTR or SQM pay a bigger dividend?: NTR yields 2.73% and SQM yields 1.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NTR or SQM more profitable?: SQM runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.44% versus SQM at 20.61%.
How have NTR and SQM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, NTR delivered 9.02% and SQM delivered 15.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NTR analysis Full SQM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Nutrien P/E ratio Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile P/E ratio Nutrien dividend yield Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile dividend yield Nutrien ROE Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile ROE Nutrien operating margin Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile operating margin Nutrien revenue growth Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile revenue growth Nutrien free cash flow Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile free cash flow

Nutrien & Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.