Is NTR or RS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: NTR trades at a 13.60 P/E and RS at 24.93.

Which has grown faster, NTR or RS?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — NTR at a 5.38% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.

Does NTR or RS pay a bigger dividend?

NTR yields 3.30% and RS yields 1.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NTR or RS more profitable?

NTR runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.58% versus RS at 5.43%.

Which has been the better investment, NTR or RS?

Over the past 5-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — NTR at 5.79% versus RS at 19.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

NTR leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Nutrien Ltd. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

NTR

Nutrien Ltd.

$31.00B

$64.57Basic Materials

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$19.22B

$376.50Basic Materials

Total return — NTR vs RS

growth of $100 · last 9y

NTR +21.9%RS +334.5%RS compounded faster

NTR RS

NTR vs RS: by the numbers

•NTR is the larger company ($31.00B vs $19.22B market cap).
•NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.60 vs 24.93 P/E).
•NTR converts more revenue to profit (8.58% vs 5.43% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.33% vs 5.38% CAGR).
•NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.30% vs 1.31%).

Which is better, NTR or RS?

Metric tally: NTR 13 · RS 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNTR(lower P/E)

GrowthRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)

QualityRS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NTR	RS
P/E ratio	13.60●	24.93
Forward P/E	12.00●	19.04
P/S ratio	1.16●	1.34
P/B ratio	1.27●	2.79
PEG ratio	0.05●	1.27
EV / EBITDA	7.15●	15.51
FCF yield	6.94%●	3.08%

Profitability

Metric	NTR	RS
Gross margin	31.16%●	27.22%
Operating margin	14.15%●	7.52%
Net margin	8.58%●	5.43%
ROE	9.46%	11.32%●
ROIC	6.79%	8.16%●

Dividends

Metric	NTR	RS
Dividend yield	3.30%●	1.31%
Payout ratio	46.41%	35.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NTR	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.38%	10.33%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	41.02%●	19.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.42%●	-9.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.79%	22.77%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, NTR or RS?: It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: RS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: RS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 13 to 4.
Is NTR or RS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: NTR trades at a 13.60 P/E and RS at 24.93.
Which has grown faster, NTR or RS?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — NTR at a 5.38% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.
Does NTR or RS pay a bigger dividend?: NTR yields 3.30% and RS yields 1.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NTR or RS more profitable?: NTR runs the higher net margin — NTR at 8.58% versus RS at 5.43%.
Which has been the better investment, NTR or RS?: Over the past 5-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — NTR at 5.79% versus RS at 19.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NTR analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Nutrien P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio Nutrien dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield Nutrien ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE Nutrien operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin Nutrien revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth Nutrien free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

Nutrien & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.