Which has grown faster, NTIC or SMID?

Over the past five years, NTIC grew revenue faster — NTIC at a 12.48% CAGR versus SMID at 11.86%.

Does NTIC or SMID pay a bigger dividend?

NTIC pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while SMID is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is NTIC or SMID more profitable?

SMID runs the higher net margin — NTIC at -1.26% versus SMID at 8.63%.

How have NTIC and SMID total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, NTIC delivered 3.04% and SMID delivered 20.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) vs Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID)

A side-by-side comparison of Northern Technologies International Corporation and Smith-Midland Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NTIC

Northern Technologies International Corporation

$74M

$7.81Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SMID

Smith-Midland Corporation

$119M

$22.34Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NTIC vs SMID

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

NTIC +32.2% (+2.8%/yr)SMID +562.7% (+20.8%/yr)SMID compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NTIC SMID

NTIC vs SMID: by the numbers

•SMID is the larger company ($119M vs $74M market cap).
•SMID is profitable (8.63% net margin) while NTIC runs a net loss (-1.26%).
•NTIC grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.48% vs 11.86% CAGR).
•NTIC pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while SMID is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NTIC	SMID
P/E ratio	N/A	15.30
Forward P/E	26.02	N/A
PEG ratio	N/A	0.43
P/S ratio	0.81	1.32
P/B ratio	1.02	2.08
EV / EBITDA	N/A	7.80
FCF yield	N/A	3.52%

Profitability

Metric	NTIC	SMID
Gross margin	35.76%	23.46%
Operating margin	-4.06%	12.07%
Net margin	-1.26%	8.63%
ROE	-1.59%	13.55%
ROIC	-2.18%	10.19%

Dividends

Metric	NTIC	SMID
Dividend yield	0.26%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NTIC	SMID
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.48%	11.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	35.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	0.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-12.73%	7.87%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, NTIC or SMID?: Over the past five years, NTIC grew revenue faster — NTIC at a 12.48% CAGR versus SMID at 11.86%.
Does NTIC or SMID pay a bigger dividend?: NTIC pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while SMID is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is NTIC or SMID more profitable?: SMID runs the higher net margin — NTIC at -1.26% versus SMID at 8.63%.
How have NTIC and SMID total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, NTIC delivered 3.04% and SMID delivered 20.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NTIC analysis Full SMID analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Smith-Midl P/E ratio Northern Technologies International dividend yield Northern Technologies International ROE Smith-Midl ROE Northern Technologies International operating margin Smith-Midl operating margin Northern Technologies International revenue growth Smith-Midl revenue growth Northern Technologies International free cash flow Smith-Midl free cash flow

Northern Technologies International & Smith-Midl appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.