NetEase, Inc. (NTES) vs United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC)
A side-by-side comparison of NetEase, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
$117.21TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
$26.27TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — NTES vs UMC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yNTES +185.1% (+11.0%/yr)UMC +2124.8% (+36.4%/yr)UMC compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NTES UMC
NTES vs UMC: by the numbers
- •NTES is the larger company ($74.83B vs $65.53B market cap).
- •NTES trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.23 vs 24.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •UMC converts more revenue to profit (33.14% vs 27.87% net margin).
- •UMC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.39% vs 6.78% CAGR).
- •NTES pays the higher dividend yield (2.50% vs 1.53%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NTES | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.23 | 24.88 |
| PEG ratio | 0.74 | 5.02 |
| P/S ratio | 4.46 | 8.22 |
| P/B ratio | 3.04 | 4.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.65 | 17.68 |
| FCF yield | 9.58% | 2.87% |
Profitability
| Metric | NTES | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 67.20% | 30.60% |
| Operating margin | 35.32% | 19.71% |
| Net margin | 27.87% | 33.14% |
| ROE | 19.00% | 18.99% |
| ROIC | 17.31% | 8.07% |
Dividends
| Metric | NTES | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 1.53% |
| Payout ratio | 40.58% | 37.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NTES | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.78% | 9.39% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 22.02% | 4.35% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.25% | 6.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.30% | 24.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NTES or UMC?
- NTES has the lower trailing P/E: NTES trades at 16.23 and UMC at 24.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NTES or UMC?
- Over the past five years, UMC grew revenue faster — NTES at a 6.78% CAGR versus UMC at 9.39%.
- Does NTES or UMC pay a bigger dividend?
- NTES yields 2.50% and UMC yields 1.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NTES or UMC more profitable?
- UMC runs the higher net margin — NTES at 27.87% versus UMC at 33.14%.
- How have NTES and UMC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, NTES delivered 11.04% and UMC delivered 36.50% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
NetEase P/E ratioUnited Microelectronics P/E ratioNetEase dividend yieldUnited Microelectronics dividend yieldNetEase ROEUnited Microelectronics ROENetEase operating marginUnited Microelectronics operating marginNetEase revenue growthUnited Microelectronics revenue growthNetEase free cash flowUnited Microelectronics free cash flow
NetEase & United Microelectronics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.