Which has the lower trailing P/E, NTAP or VRSK?

NTAP has the lower trailing P/E: NTAP trades at 26.70 and VRSK at 31.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, NTAP or VRSK?

Over the past five years, NTAP grew revenue faster — NTAP at a 4.18% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.

Does NTAP or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?

NTAP yields 0.92% and VRSK yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NTAP or VRSK more profitable?

VRSK runs the higher net margin — NTAP at 18.43% versus VRSK at 29.34%.

How have NTAP and VRSK total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, NTAP delivered 23.14% and VRSK delivered 9.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)

A side-by-side comparison of NetApp, Inc. and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

$34.19B

$174.53TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VRSK

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

$27.81B

$212.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NTAP vs VRSK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17y

NTAP +753.6%VRSK +698.7%NTAP compounded faster

NTAP VRSK

NTAP vs VRSK: by the numbers

•NTAP is the larger company ($34.19B vs $27.81B market cap).
•NTAP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.70 vs 31.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 18.43% net margin).
•NTAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.18% vs 1.92% CAGR).
•VRSK pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.92%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NTAP	VRSK
P/E ratio	26.70	31.46
Forward P/E	21.27	26.96
P/S ratio	4.88	9.01
P/B ratio	25.01	92.99
PEG ratio	1.58	3.81
EV / EBITDA	18.42	18.83
FCF yield	5.53%	4.03%

Profitability

Metric	NTAP	VRSK
Gross margin	70.74%	67.44%
Operating margin	24.12%	44.87%
Net margin	18.43%	29.34%
ROE	94.45%	293.95%
ROIC	19.40%	19.56%

Dividends

Metric	NTAP	VRSK
Dividend yield	0.92%	0.92%
Payout ratio	24.26%	29.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NTAP	VRSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.18%	1.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.39%	8.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.50%	4.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.81%	2.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, NTAP or VRSK?: NTAP has the lower trailing P/E: NTAP trades at 26.70 and VRSK at 31.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, NTAP or VRSK?: Over the past five years, NTAP grew revenue faster — NTAP at a 4.18% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
Does NTAP or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?: NTAP yields 0.92% and VRSK yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NTAP or VRSK more profitable?: VRSK runs the higher net margin — NTAP at 18.43% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
How have NTAP and VRSK total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, NTAP delivered 23.14% and VRSK delivered 9.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NTAP analysis Full VRSK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

NetApp P/E ratio Verisk Analytics P/E ratio NetApp dividend yield Verisk Analytics dividend yield NetApp ROE Verisk Analytics ROE NetApp operating margin Verisk Analytics operating margin NetApp revenue growth Verisk Analytics revenue growth NetApp free cash flow Verisk Analytics free cash flow

NetApp & Verisk Analytics appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.