NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) vs Ubiquiti Inc. (UI)
NTAP leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of NetApp, Inc. and Ubiquiti Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — NTAP vs UI
growth of $100 · last 15yNTAP +312.0%UI +3264.2%UI compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NTAP UI
NTAP vs UI: by the numbers
- •UI is the larger company ($35.63B vs $31.66B market cap).
- •NTAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.41 vs 37.84 P/E).
- •UI converts more revenue to profit (30.43% vs 18.43% net margin).
- •UI grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.27% vs 4.18% CAGR).
- •NTAP pays the higher dividend yield (1.29% vs 0.54%).
Which is better, NTAP or UI?
Metric tally: NTAP 11 · UI 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTAP(lower P/E)
GrowthUI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNTAP(higher dividend yield)
QualityUI(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | NTAP | UI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.41● | 37.84 |
| Forward P/E | 20.24● | 38.60 |
| P/S ratio | 4.64● | 11.52 |
| P/B ratio | 23.80● | 29.66 |
| PEG ratio | 1.57 | 0.34● |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.77● | 31.55 |
| FCF yield | 5.81%● | 2.10% |
Profitability
| Metric | NTAP | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 70.74%● | 46.02% |
| Operating margin | 24.12% | 35.75%● |
| Net margin | 18.43% | 30.43%● |
| ROE | 94.45%● | 78.37% |
| ROIC | 19.40% | 72.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | NTAP | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.29%● | 0.54% |
| Payout ratio | 32.35% | 27.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NTAP | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.18% | 12.27%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.39% | 15.17%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 12.50%● | 6.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.84%● | 14.04% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NTAP or UI?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTAP (lower P/E); growth: UI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTAP (higher dividend yield); quality: UI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTAP leads 11 to 6.
- Is NTAP or UI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: NTAP trades at a 25.41 P/E and UI at 37.84.
- Which has grown faster, NTAP or UI?
- Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — NTAP at a 4.18% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.
- Does NTAP or UI pay a bigger dividend?
- NTAP yields 1.29% and UI yields 0.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NTAP or UI more profitable?
- UI runs the higher net margin — NTAP at 18.43% versus UI at 30.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, NTAP or UI?
- Over the past 10-year, UI delivered the higher annualized total return — NTAP at 23.82% versus UI at 31.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
NetApp P/E ratioUbiquiti P/E ratioNetApp dividend yieldUbiquiti dividend yieldNetApp ROEUbiquiti ROENetApp operating marginUbiquiti operating marginNetApp revenue growthUbiquiti revenue growthNetApp free cash flowUbiquiti free cash flow
NetApp & Ubiquiti appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.