Is NTAP or ROP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: NTAP trades at a 25.11 P/E and ROP at 20.63.

Which has grown faster, NTAP or ROP?

Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — NTAP at a 4.18% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.

Does NTAP or ROP pay a bigger dividend?

NTAP yields 1.30% and ROP yields 1.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NTAP or ROP more profitable?

ROP runs the higher net margin — NTAP at 18.43% versus ROP at 21.12%.

Which has been the better investment, NTAP or ROP?

Over the past 10-year, NTAP delivered the higher annualized total return — NTAP at 23.49% versus ROP at 7.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

ROP leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of NetApp, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Roper Technologies, Inc.

$33.33B

$330.26Technology

Total return — NTAP vs ROP

growth of $100 · last 30y

NTAP +8395.2%ROP +2756.9%NTAP compounded faster

NTAP ROP

NTAP vs ROP: by the numbers

•ROP is the larger company ($33.33B vs $31.29B market cap).
•ROP trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.63 vs 25.11 P/E).
•ROP converts more revenue to profit (21.12% vs 18.43% net margin).
•ROP grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.25% vs 4.18% CAGR).
•NTAP pays the higher dividend yield (1.30% vs 1.05%).

Which is better, NTAP or ROP?

Metric tally: NTAP 7 · ROP 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueROP(lower P/E)

GrowthROP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeNTAP(higher dividend yield)

QualityNTAP(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NTAP	ROP
P/E ratio	25.11	20.63●
Forward P/E	20.01	15.07●
P/S ratio	4.59	4.26●
P/B ratio	23.53	1.84●
PEG ratio	1.58●	2.16
EV / EBITDA	16.58	12.28●
FCF yield	5.88%	7.39%●

Profitability

Metric	NTAP	ROP
Gross margin	70.74%	69.40%
Operating margin	24.12%	28.09%●
Net margin	18.43%	21.12%●
ROE	94.45%●	9.11%
ROIC	19.40%●	5.62%

Dividends

Metric	NTAP	ROP
Dividend yield	1.30%●	1.05%
Payout ratio	32.35%	24.25%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NTAP	ROP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.18%	9.25%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.39%●	9.53%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.50%●	8.90%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.09%●	-5.40%

Frequently asked

Which is better, NTAP or ROP?: It depends on your goal. value: ROP (lower P/E); growth: ROP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTAP (higher dividend yield); quality: NTAP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ROP leads 9 to 7.
Is NTAP or ROP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: NTAP trades at a 25.11 P/E and ROP at 20.63.
Which has grown faster, NTAP or ROP?: Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — NTAP at a 4.18% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.
Does NTAP or ROP pay a bigger dividend?: NTAP yields 1.30% and ROP yields 1.05% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NTAP or ROP more profitable?: ROP runs the higher net margin — NTAP at 18.43% versus ROP at 21.12%.
Which has been the better investment, NTAP or ROP?: Over the past 10-year, NTAP delivered the higher annualized total return — NTAP at 23.49% versus ROP at 7.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NTAP analysis Full ROP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

NetApp P/E ratio Roper Technologies P/E ratio NetApp dividend yield Roper Technologies dividend yield NetApp ROE Roper Technologies ROE NetApp operating margin Roper Technologies operating margin NetApp revenue growth Roper Technologies revenue growth NetApp free cash flow Roper Technologies free cash flow

NetApp & Roper Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.