CO2 Energy Transition Corp. (NOEM) vs Quartzsea Acquisition Corporation (QSEA)
A side-by-side comparison of CO2 Energy Transition Corp. and Quartzsea Acquisition Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
NOEM
CO2 Energy Transition Corp.
$10.63Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QSEA
Quartzsea Acquisition Corporation
$10.66Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — NOEM vs QSEA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yNOEM +5.2% (+5.2%/yr)QSEA +7.2% (+7.2%/yr)QSEA compounded faster over this window
NOEM QSEA
NOEM vs QSEA: by the numbers
- •QSEA is the larger company ($108M vs $102M market cap).
- •NOEM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (69.61 vs 83.15 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NOEM | QSEA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 69.61 | 83.15 |
| P/B ratio | 1.45 | 1.31 |
Profitability
| Metric | NOEM | QSEA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Operating margin | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net margin | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ROE | 2.08% | 2.03% |
| ROIC | -0.70% | -1.83% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NOEM or QSEA?
- NOEM has the lower trailing P/E: NOEM trades at 69.61 and QSEA at 83.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CO2 Energy Transition P/E ratioQuartzsea Acquisition P/E ratioCO2 Energy Transition ROEQuartzsea Acquisition ROECO2 Energy Transition operating marginQuartzsea Acquisition operating marginCO2 Energy Transition revenue growthQuartzsea Acquisition revenue growthCO2 Energy Transition free cash flowQuartzsea Acquisition free cash flow
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.