Which has the lower trailing P/E, NOC or WM?

NOC has the lower trailing P/E: NOC trades at 18.34 and WM at 32.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, NOC or WM?

Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — NOC at a 2.67% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does NOC or WM pay a bigger dividend?

NOC yields 1.63% and WM yields 1.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NOC or WM more profitable?

WM runs the higher net margin — NOC at 10.48% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have NOC and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, NOC delivered 12.01% and WM delivered 15.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Northrop Grumman Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NOC

Northrop Grumman Corporation

$82.02B

$577.32IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Waste Management, Inc.

$90.46B

$226.32IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NOC vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

NOC +210.6% (+12.0%/yr)WM +313.6% (+15.3%/yr)WM compounded faster over this window

NOC WM

NOC vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($90.46B vs $82.02B market cap).
•NOC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.34 vs 32.06 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WM converts more revenue to profit (11.12% vs 10.48% net margin).
•WM grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.22% vs 2.67% CAGR).
•NOC pays the higher dividend yield (1.63% vs 1.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NOC	WM
P/E ratio	18.34	32.06
Forward P/E	20.02	27.88
P/S ratio	1.92	3.56
P/B ratio	4.60	9.20
EV / EBITDA	16.33	14.68
FCF yield	4.43%	3.91%

Profitability

Metric	NOC	WM
Gross margin	20.06%	35.04%
Operating margin	10.18%	18.54%
Net margin	10.48%	11.12%
ROE	25.14%	28.74%
ROIC	9.21%	8.88%

Dividends

Metric	NOC	WM
Dividend yield	1.63%	1.56%
Payout ratio	32.26%	52.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NOC	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.67%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	8.84%	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.92%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.46%	10.27%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, NOC or WM?: NOC has the lower trailing P/E: NOC trades at 18.34 and WM at 32.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, NOC or WM?: Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — NOC at a 2.67% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does NOC or WM pay a bigger dividend?: NOC yields 1.63% and WM yields 1.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NOC or WM more profitable?: WM runs the higher net margin — NOC at 10.48% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have NOC and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, NOC delivered 12.01% and WM delivered 15.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NOC analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Northrop Grumman P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Northrop Grumman dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Northrop Grumman ROE Waste Management ROE Northrop Grumman operating margin Waste Management operating margin Northrop Grumman revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Northrop Grumman free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Northrop Grumman & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.