Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) vs Saratoga Investment Corp 6.25% (SAF)
Over the past 3 years, NMS outperformed SAF — 6.89% vs 6.20% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund and Saratoga Investment Corp 6.25% across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — NMS vs SAF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yMetrics side by side
Did NMS beat SAF?
Over the past 3 years, NMS outperformed SAF — 6.89% vs 6.20% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | NMS | SAF |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -2.55% | 6.36% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 6.89% | 6.20% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.55% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 0.37% | N/A |
SAF is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NMS beaten SAF?
- Over the past 3 years, NMS outperformed SAF — 6.89% vs 6.20% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.