Newmont Corporation (NEM) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
A side-by-side comparison of Newmont Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$91.52Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$354.27Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — NEM vs SHW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yNEM +199.1%SHW +6954.1%SHW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NEM SHW
NEM vs SHW: by the numbers
- •NEM is the larger company ($96.43B vs $87.38B market cap).
- •NEM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.77 vs 31.41 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NEM converts more revenue to profit (44.93% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •NEM grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.00% vs 4.87% CAGR).
- •NEM pays the higher dividend yield (1.09% vs 0.97%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.77 | 31.41 |
| Forward P/E | 9.84 | 27.83 |
| P/S ratio | 5.21 | 3.39 |
| P/B ratio | 2.82 | 18.32 |
| PEG ratio | 0.13 | 4.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.91 | 21.17 |
| FCF yield | 10.59% | 3.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.20% | 49.12% |
| Operating margin | 46.85% | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 44.93% | 10.86% |
| ROE | 24.28% | 58.66% |
| ROIC | 12.23% | 15.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.09% | 0.97% |
| Payout ratio | 15.91% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.00% | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.74% | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 23.96% | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.48% | 3.54% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NEM or SHW?
- NEM has the lower trailing P/E: NEM trades at 11.77 and SHW at 31.41. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NEM or SHW?
- Over the past five years, NEM grew revenue faster — NEM at a 9.00% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does NEM or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- NEM yields 1.09% and SHW yields 0.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NEM or SHW more profitable?
- NEM runs the higher net margin — NEM at 44.93% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- How have NEM and SHW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, NEM delivered 10.42% and SHW delivered 13.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Newmont P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioNewmont dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldNewmont ROESherwin-Williams ROENewmont operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginNewmont revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthNewmont free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Newmont & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.