Newmont Corporation (NEM) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
NEM leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Newmont Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$100.23Basic Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$317.30Basic Materials
Total return — NEM vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 30yNEM +98.0%SHW +4300.8%SHW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NEM SHW
NEM vs SHW: by the numbers
- •NEM is the larger company ($107.00B vs $78.26B market cap).
- •NEM trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.97 vs 30.45 P/E).
- •NEM converts more revenue to profit (34.64% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •NEM grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.80% vs 4.87% CAGR).
- •NEM pays the higher dividend yield (1.02% vs 1.00%).
Which is better, NEM or SHW?
Metric tally: NEM 13 · SHW 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNEM(lower P/E)
GrowthNEM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.97● | 30.45 |
| Forward P/E | 8.73● | 27.07 |
| P/S ratio | 4.46 | 3.29● |
| P/B ratio | 3.12● | 17.77 |
| PEG ratio | 0.13● | 4.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.26● | 20.64 |
| FCF yield | 11.26%● | 3.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.12%● | 49.12% |
| Operating margin | 52.62%● | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 34.64%● | 10.86% |
| ROE | 24.21% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 12.23% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 1.00% |
| Payout ratio | 15.91% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.80%● | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.74%● | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.17%● | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.48%● | 3.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NEM or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: NEM (lower P/E); growth: NEM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NEM leads 13 to 3.
- Is NEM or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NEM is cheaper: NEM trades at a 12.97 P/E and SHW at 30.45.
- Which has grown faster, NEM or SHW?
- Over the past five years, NEM grew revenue faster — NEM at a 15.80% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does NEM or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- NEM yields 1.02% and SHW yields 1.00% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NEM or SHW more profitable?
- NEM runs the higher net margin — NEM at 34.64% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, NEM or SHW?
- Over the past 10-year, SHW delivered the higher annualized total return — NEM at 13.31% versus SHW at 13.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Newmont P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioNewmont dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldNewmont ROESherwin-Williams ROENewmont operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginNewmont revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthNewmont free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Newmont & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.