Which has the lower trailing P/E, NEM or SHW?

NEM has the lower trailing P/E: NEM trades at 15.97 and SHW at 29.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, NEM or SHW?

Over the past five years, NEM grew revenue faster — NEM at a 12.68% CAGR versus SHW at 4.44%.

Does NEM or SHW pay a bigger dividend?

NEM yields 0.82% and SHW yields 0.99% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is NEM or SHW more profitable?

NEM runs the higher net margin — NEM at 38.06% versus SHW at 11.01%.

How have NEM and SHW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, NEM delivered 14.89% and SHW delivered 14.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Newmont Corporation (NEM) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)

A side-by-side comparison of Newmont Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NEM

Newmont Corporation

$133.62B

$126.81Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SHW

The Sherwin-Williams Company

$78.49B

$323.31Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NEM vs SHW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

NEM +287.7% (+14.5%/yr)SHW +285.0% (+14.4%/yr)NEM compounded faster over this window

NEM SHW

NEM vs SHW: by the numbers

•NEM is the larger company ($133.62B vs $78.49B market cap).
•NEM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.97 vs 29.80 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NEM converts more revenue to profit (38.06% vs 11.01% net margin).
•NEM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.68% vs 4.44% CAGR).
•SHW pays the higher dividend yield (0.99% vs 0.82%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NEM	SHW
P/E ratio	15.97	29.80
Forward P/E	13.42	26.70
P/S ratio	5.92	3.22
P/B ratio	3.77	20.36
EV / EBITDA	9.10	19.95
FCF yield	6.22%	4.09%

Profitability

Metric	NEM	SHW
Gross margin	54.52%	49.07%
Operating margin	51.36%	16.36%
Net margin	38.06%	11.01%
ROE	24.28%	69.74%
ROIC	13.76%	14.59%

Dividends

Metric	NEM	SHW
Dividend yield	0.82%	0.99%
Payout ratio	12.97%	29.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NEM	SHW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.68%	4.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.74%	6.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	28.75%	-0.06%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.47%	2.45%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, NEM or SHW?: NEM has the lower trailing P/E: NEM trades at 15.97 and SHW at 29.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, NEM or SHW?: Over the past five years, NEM grew revenue faster — NEM at a 12.68% CAGR versus SHW at 4.44%.
Does NEM or SHW pay a bigger dividend?: NEM yields 0.82% and SHW yields 0.99% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is NEM or SHW more profitable?: NEM runs the higher net margin — NEM at 38.06% versus SHW at 11.01%.
How have NEM and SHW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, NEM delivered 14.89% and SHW delivered 14.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NEM analysis Full SHW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Newmont P/E ratio Sherwin-Williams P/E ratio Newmont dividend yield Sherwin-Williams dividend yield Newmont ROE Sherwin-Williams ROE Newmont operating margin Sherwin-Williams operating margin Newmont revenue growth Sherwin-Williams revenue growth Newmont free cash flow Sherwin-Williams free cash flow

Newmont & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.