Which has the lower trailing P/E, NCLH or RUSHB?

NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: NCLH trades at 9.69 and RUSHB at 17.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, NCLH or RUSHB?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — NCLH at a 236.47% CAGR versus RUSHB at 7.70%.

Does NCLH or RUSHB pay a bigger dividend?

RUSHB pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is NCLH or RUSHB more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — NCLH at 7.49% versus RUSHB at 3.67%.

How have NCLH and RUSHB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, NCLH delivered -9.02% and RUSHB delivered 24.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB)

A side-by-side comparison of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$7.12B

$15.51Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RUSHB

Rush Enterprises, Inc.

$6.73B

$56.54Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — NCLH vs RUSHB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

NCLH -61.5% (-9.1%/yr)RUSHB +773.1% (+24.2%/yr)RUSHB compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

NCLH RUSHB

NCLH vs RUSHB: by the numbers

•NCLH is the larger company ($7.12B vs $6.73B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.69 vs 17.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (7.49% vs 3.67% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (236.47% vs 7.70% CAGR).
•RUSHB pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NCLH	RUSHB
P/E ratio	9.69	17.03
Forward P/E	10.08	22.93
PEG ratio	N/A	1.65
P/S ratio	0.70	0.93
P/B ratio	2.77	2.89
EV / EBITDA	8.40	14.80
FCF yield	N/A	1.86%

Profitability

Metric	NCLH	RUSHB
Gross margin	31.97%	18.98%
Operating margin	15.09%	5.13%
Net margin	7.49%	3.67%
ROE	29.57%	11.38%
ROIC	8.01%	7.17%

Dividends

Metric	NCLH	RUSHB
Dividend yield	N/A	0.92%
Payout ratio	N/A	15.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NCLH	RUSHB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	236.47%	7.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	19.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-22.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-11.74%	23.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, NCLH or RUSHB?: NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: NCLH trades at 9.69 and RUSHB at 17.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, NCLH or RUSHB?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — NCLH at a 236.47% CAGR versus RUSHB at 7.70%.
Does NCLH or RUSHB pay a bigger dividend?: RUSHB pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is NCLH or RUSHB more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — NCLH at 7.49% versus RUSHB at 3.67%.
How have NCLH and RUSHB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, NCLH delivered -9.02% and RUSHB delivered 24.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NCLH analysis Full RUSHB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio Rush Enterprises P/E ratio Rush Enterprises dividend yield Norwegian Cruise Line ROE Rush Enterprises ROE Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin Rush Enterprises operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth Rush Enterprises revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow Rush Enterprises free cash flow

Norwegian Cruise Line & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.