Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) vs Interactive Strength Inc. (TRNR)

A side-by-side comparison of Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited and Interactive Strength Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — NCI vs TRNR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
NCI -99.8% (-95.1%/yr)TRNR -100.0% (-99.8%/yr)NCI compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
00001101001kStart $10020252026$0$0
NCI TRNR

NCI vs TRNR: by the numbers

  • •TRNR is the larger company ($1M vs $452832 market cap).
  • •NCI is profitable (0.24% net margin) while TRNR runs a net loss (-159.24%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricNCITRNR
P/S ratioN/A0.06
P/B ratio0.061.11

Profitability

MetricNCITRNR
Gross margin36.93%7.92%
Operating margin1.32%-172.23%
Net margin0.24%-159.24%
ROE0.59%-987.80%
ROIC0.99%-52.25%

Growth (annualized)

MetricNCITRNR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-5.62%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)22.91%N/A

Frequently asked

Is NCI or TRNR more profitable?
NCI runs the higher net margin — NCI at 0.24% versus TRNR at -159.24%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.