Namib Minerals (NAMM) vs Tactical Resources Corp. (TREO)
Over the past year, NAMM outperformed TREO — -60.88% vs -80.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Namib Minerals and Tactical Resources Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — NAMM vs TREO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMetrics side by side
Did NAMM beat TREO?
Over the past year, NAMM outperformed TREO — -60.88% vs -80.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | NAMM | TREO |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -60.88% | -80.75% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | N/A | 23.38% |
TREO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has NAMM beaten TREO?
- Over the past year, NAMM outperformed TREO — -60.88% vs -80.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.