Which has grown faster, NAD or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — NAD at a 0.95% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.

Does NAD or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

NAD pays a dividend (7.29% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is NAD or WULF more profitable?

NAD runs the higher net margin — NAD at 31.79% versus WULF at -1179.94%.

How have NAD and WULF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, NAD delivered 2.38% and WULF delivered 4.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

NAD

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund

$2.72B

$11.67Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$7.75B

$15.64Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — NAD vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

NAD +29.5% (+2.6%/yr)WULF +61.8% (+4.9%/yr)WULF compounded faster over this window

NAD WULF

NAD vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($7.75B vs $2.72B market cap).
•NAD is profitable (31.79% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 0.95% CAGR).
•NAD pays a dividend (7.29% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	NAD	WULF
P/E ratio	11.22	N/A
P/S ratio	6.40	45.99
P/B ratio	0.98	51.58

Profitability

Metric	NAD	WULF
Gross margin	86.34%	50.93%
Operating margin	69.73%	-101.10%
Net margin	31.79%	-1179.94%
ROE	2.29%	-1323.42%

Dividends

Metric	NAD	WULF
Dividend yield	7.29%	N/A
Payout ratio	303.93%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	NAD	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.95%	73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-10.59%	-27.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.55%	-3.68%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, NAD or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — NAD at a 0.95% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Does NAD or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: NAD pays a dividend (7.29% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is NAD or WULF more profitable?: NAD runs the higher net margin — NAD at 31.79% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have NAD and WULF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, NAD delivered 2.38% and WULF delivered 4.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full NAD analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratio Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yield Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund ROE TeraWulf ROE Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.