Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) vs Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT)
Over the past 10 years, SAFT outperformed NAC — 9.11% vs 0.56% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund and Safety Insurance Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — NAC vs SAFT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did SAFT beat NAC?
Over the past 10 years, SAFT outperformed NAC — 9.11% vs 0.56% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | NAC | SAFT |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -6.80% | 53.11% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 8.87% | 19.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.89% | 10.23% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 0.56% | 9.11% |
NAC is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has SAFT beaten NAC?
- Over the past 10 years, SAFT outperformed NAC — 9.11% vs 0.56% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.