Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) vs Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
Over the past 5 years, PWP outperformed NAC — 5.32% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund and Perella Weinberg Partners across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — NAC vs PWP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yMetrics side by side
Did PWP beat NAC?
Over the past 5 years, PWP outperformed NAC — 5.32% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | NAC | PWP |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -6.80% | -23.26% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 8.87% | 18.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.89% | 5.32% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 0.56% | N/A |
NAC is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has PWP beaten NAC?
- Over the past 5 years, PWP outperformed NAC — 5.32% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.