Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs AT&T Inc. (T)
A side-by-side comparison of Nano Labs Ltd and AT&T Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: NA is classified in Technology; T is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
T
AT&T Inc.
$24.67Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — NA vs T
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yNA -98.4%T +44.8%T compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NA T
NA vs T: by the numbers
- •T is the larger company ($169.05B vs $119M market cap).
- •NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 8.11 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 16.89% net margin).
- •NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs -5.37% CAGR).
- •T pays a dividend (4.55% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NA | T |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.30 | 8.11 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 10.46 |
| P/S ratio | 11.40 | 1.33 |
| P/B ratio | 0.41 | 1.54 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.44 | 6.39 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 10.41% |
Profitability
| Metric | NA | T |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -147.33% | 79.77% |
| Operating margin | -396.84% | 20.38% |
| Net margin | 505.49% | 16.89% |
| ROE | 17.96% | 19.46% |
| ROIC | -10.96% | 5.57% |
Dividends
| Metric | NA | T |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.55% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 36.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NA | T |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 64.16% | -5.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 8.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -9.29% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 9.61% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NA or T?
- NA has the lower trailing P/E: NA trades at 2.30 and T at 8.11. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NA or T?
- Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — NA at a 64.16% CAGR versus T at -5.37%.
- Does NA or T pay a bigger dividend?
- T pays a dividend (4.55% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is NA or T more profitable?
- NA runs the higher net margin — NA at 505.49% versus T at 16.89%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nano Labs P/E ratioAT&T P/E ratioNano Labs dividend yieldAT&T dividend yieldNano Labs ROEAT&T ROENano Labs operating marginAT&T operating marginNano Labs revenue growthAT&T revenue growthNano Labs free cash flowAT&T free cash flow
Nano Labs & AT&T appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.