Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD)
A side-by-side comparison of Nano Labs Ltd and Smithfield Foods, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: NA is classified in Technology; SFD is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
$27.10Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — NA vs SFD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yNA -73.3%SFD +38.9%SFD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NA SFD
NA vs SFD: by the numbers
- •SFD is the larger company ($10.66B vs $119M market cap).
- •NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 10.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 6.48% net margin).
- •NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 0.92% CAGR).
- •SFD pays a dividend (4.23% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NA | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.30 | 10.38 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 10.04 |
| P/S ratio | 11.40 | 0.67 |
| P/B ratio | 0.41 | 1.53 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 2.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.44 | 6.87 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 7.76% |
Profitability
| Metric | NA | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -147.33% | 13.44% |
| Operating margin | -396.84% | 8.62% |
| Net margin | 505.49% | 6.48% |
| ROE | 17.96% | 14.69% |
| ROIC | -10.96% | 9.58% |
Dividends
| Metric | NA | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.23% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 44.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NA | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 64.16% | 0.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 7.75% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.08% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NA or SFD?
- NA has the lower trailing P/E: NA trades at 2.30 and SFD at 10.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NA or SFD?
- Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — NA at a 64.16% CAGR versus SFD at 0.92%.
- Does NA or SFD pay a bigger dividend?
- SFD pays a dividend (4.23% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is NA or SFD more profitable?
- NA runs the higher net margin — NA at 505.49% versus SFD at 6.48%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nano Labs P/E ratioSmithfield Foods P/E ratioNano Labs dividend yieldSmithfield Foods dividend yieldNano Labs ROESmithfield Foods ROENano Labs operating marginSmithfield Foods operating marginNano Labs revenue growthSmithfield Foods revenue growthNano Labs free cash flowSmithfield Foods free cash flow
Nano Labs & Smithfield Foods appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.