Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs Rio Tinto Group (RIO)
A side-by-side comparison of Nano Labs Ltd and Rio Tinto Group across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: NA is classified in Technology; RIO is classified in Basic Materials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
$91.64Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — NA vs RIO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yNA -98.4%RIO +106.2%RIO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NA RIO
NA vs RIO: by the numbers
- •RIO is the larger company ($148.82B vs $119M market cap).
- •NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 6.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 19.28% net margin).
- •NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 4.92% CAGR).
- •RIO pays a dividend (4.37% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NA | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.30 | 6.98 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 11.23 |
| P/S ratio | 11.40 | 1.35 |
| P/B ratio | 0.41 | 2.42 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 19.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.44 | 3.99 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 7.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | NA | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -147.33% | 27.57% |
| Operating margin | -396.84% | 27.10% |
| Net margin | 505.49% | 19.28% |
| ROE | 17.96% | 34.53% |
| ROIC | -10.96% | 9.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | NA | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.37% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 65.37% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NA | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 64.16% | 4.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 0.36% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -11.74% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 10.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NA or RIO?
- NA has the lower trailing P/E: NA trades at 2.30 and RIO at 6.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NA or RIO?
- Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — NA at a 64.16% CAGR versus RIO at 4.92%.
- Does NA or RIO pay a bigger dividend?
- RIO pays a dividend (4.37% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is NA or RIO more profitable?
- NA runs the higher net margin — NA at 505.49% versus RIO at 19.28%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nano Labs P/E ratioRio Tinto P/E ratioNano Labs dividend yieldRio Tinto dividend yieldNano Labs ROERio Tinto ROENano Labs operating marginRio Tinto operating marginNano Labs revenue growthRio Tinto revenue growthNano Labs free cash flowRio Tinto free cash flow
Nano Labs & Rio Tinto appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.