Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL)
A side-by-side comparison of Nano Labs Ltd and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: NA is classified in Technology; RCL is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$322.50Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — NA vs RCL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yNA -98.4%RCL +748.2%RCL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NA RCL
NA vs RCL: by the numbers
- •RCL is the larger company ($86.49B vs $119M market cap).
- •NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 18.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 23.56% net margin).
- •RCL grew revenue faster over the past five years (188.60% vs 64.16% CAGR).
- •RCL pays a dividend (1.64% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | NA | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.30 | 18.61 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 17.61 |
| P/S ratio | 11.40 | 4.50 |
| P/B ratio | 0.41 | 8.43 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.44 | 15.31 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 1.66% |
Profitability
| Metric | NA | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -147.33% | 46.64% |
| Operating margin | -396.84% | 27.32% |
| Net margin | 505.49% | 23.56% |
| ROE | 17.96% | 43.01% |
| ROIC | -10.96% | 14.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | NA | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.64% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 31.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NA | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 64.16% | 188.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 9.81% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 11.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 32.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, NA or RCL?
- NA has the lower trailing P/E: NA trades at 2.30 and RCL at 18.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, NA or RCL?
- Over the past five years, RCL grew revenue faster — NA at a 64.16% CAGR versus RCL at 188.60%.
- Does NA or RCL pay a bigger dividend?
- RCL pays a dividend (1.64% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is NA or RCL more profitable?
- NA runs the higher net margin — NA at 505.49% versus RCL at 23.56%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Nano Labs P/E ratioRoyal Caribbean Cruises P/E ratioNano Labs dividend yieldRoyal Caribbean Cruises dividend yieldNano Labs ROERoyal Caribbean Cruises ROENano Labs operating marginRoyal Caribbean Cruises operating marginNano Labs revenue growthRoyal Caribbean Cruises revenue growthNano Labs free cash flowRoyal Caribbean Cruises free cash flow
Nano Labs & Royal Caribbean Cruises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.