Which has grown faster, MUSA or XPEV?

Over the past five years, XPEV grew revenue faster — MUSA at a 9.42% CAGR versus XPEV at 43.64%.

Does MUSA or XPEV pay a bigger dividend?

MUSA pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while XPEV has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MUSA or XPEV more profitable?

MUSA runs the higher net margin — MUSA at 2.87% versus XPEV at -4.20%.

How have MUSA and XPEV total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, MUSA delivered 25.49% and XPEV delivered -23.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) vs XPeng Inc. (XPEV)

A side-by-side comparison of Murphy USA Inc. and XPeng Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MUSA

Murphy USA Inc.

$9.51B

$515.02Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

XPEV

XPeng Inc.

$8.79B

$9.25Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MUSA vs XPEV

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

MUSA +287.2% (+25.3%/yr)XPEV -55.6% (-12.7%/yr)MUSA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MUSA XPEV

MUSA vs XPEV: by the numbers

•MUSA is the larger company ($9.51B vs $8.79B market cap).
•MUSA is profitable (2.87% net margin) while XPEV runs a net loss (-4.20%).
•XPEV grew revenue faster over the past five years (43.64% vs 9.42% CAGR).
•MUSA pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while XPEV has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MUSA	XPEV
P/E ratio	15.69	N/A
Forward P/E	14.75	N/A
PEG ratio	1.21	N/A
P/S ratio	0.44	0.82
P/B ratio	12.15	2.21
EV / EBITDA	9.81	N/A
FCF yield	5.69%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MUSA	XPEV
Gross margin	7.26%	20.70%
Operating margin	4.38%	-6.81%
Net margin	2.87%	-4.20%
ROE	78.86%	-11.38%
ROIC	17.90%	-6.98%

Dividends

Metric	MUSA	XPEV
Dividend yield	0.50%	N/A
Payout ratio	7.77%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MUSA	XPEV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.42%	43.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.97%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.64%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.49%	-23.29%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MUSA or XPEV?: Over the past five years, XPEV grew revenue faster — MUSA at a 9.42% CAGR versus XPEV at 43.64%.
Does MUSA or XPEV pay a bigger dividend?: MUSA pays a dividend (0.50% yield), while XPEV has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MUSA or XPEV more profitable?: MUSA runs the higher net margin — MUSA at 2.87% versus XPEV at -4.20%.
How have MUSA and XPEV total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, MUSA delivered 25.49% and XPEV delivered -23.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MUSA analysis Full XPEV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Murphy USA P/E ratio Murphy USA dividend yield Murphy USA ROE XPeng ROE Murphy USA operating margin XPeng operating margin Murphy USA revenue growth XPeng revenue growth Murphy USA free cash flow XPeng free cash flow

Murphy USA & XPeng appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.