Which has grown faster, MUSA or NIO?

Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — MUSA at a 9.42% CAGR versus NIO at 31.23%.

Does MUSA or NIO pay a bigger dividend?

MUSA pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while NIO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MUSA or NIO more profitable?

MUSA runs the higher net margin — MUSA at 2.87% versus NIO at -3.81%.

How have MUSA and NIO total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, MUSA delivered 29.38% and NIO delivered -37.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) vs NIO Inc. (NIO)

A side-by-side comparison of Murphy USA Inc. and NIO Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MUSA

Murphy USA Inc.

$9.35B

$506.37Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 30, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

NIO

NIO Inc.

$8.55B

$3.45Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 30, 2026, 1:45 PM EDT

Total return — MUSA vs NIO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

MUSA +551.7% (+26.4%/yr)NIO -44.1% (-7.0%/yr)MUSA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MUSA NIO

MUSA vs NIO: by the numbers

•MUSA is the larger company ($9.35B vs $8.55B market cap).
•MUSA is profitable (2.87% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-3.81%).
•NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.23% vs 9.42% CAGR).
•MUSA pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while NIO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MUSA	NIO
P/E ratio	15.42	N/A
Forward P/E	14.51	N/A
P/S ratio	0.44	0.52
P/B ratio	11.95	14.28
EV / EBITDA	9.68	N/A
FCF yield	5.79%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MUSA	NIO
Gross margin	7.26%	17.43%
Operating margin	4.38%	-16.89%
Net margin	2.87%	-3.81%
ROE	78.86%	-104.27%
ROIC	17.90%	-6.44%

Dividends

Metric	MUSA	NIO
Dividend yield	0.49%	N/A
Payout ratio	7.77%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MUSA	NIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.42%	31.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.97%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.64%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.38%	-37.26%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MUSA or NIO?: Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — MUSA at a 9.42% CAGR versus NIO at 31.23%.
Does MUSA or NIO pay a bigger dividend?: MUSA pays a dividend (0.49% yield), while NIO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MUSA or NIO more profitable?: MUSA runs the higher net margin — MUSA at 2.87% versus NIO at -3.81%.
How have MUSA and NIO total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, MUSA delivered 29.38% and NIO delivered -37.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MUSA analysis Full NIO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Murphy USA P/E ratio Murphy USA dividend yield Murphy USA ROE NIO ROE Murphy USA operating margin NIO operating margin Murphy USA revenue growth NIO revenue growth Murphy USA free cash flow NIO free cash flow

Murphy USA & NIO appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.