Which has the lower trailing P/E, MUSA or NCLH?

NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: MUSA trades at 17.34 and NCLH at 11.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MUSA or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MUSA at a 9.42% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.

Does MUSA or NCLH pay a bigger dividend?

MUSA pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MUSA or NCLH more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — MUSA at 2.87% versus NCLH at 7.49%.

How have MUSA and NCLH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MUSA delivered 22.75% and NCLH delivered -6.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

A side-by-side comparison of Murphy USA Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 16, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MUSA

Murphy USA Inc.

$10.51B

$569.12Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$8.73B

$19.01Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — MUSA vs NCLH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MUSA +677.6% (+22.8%/yr)NCLH -49.5% (-6.6%/yr)MUSA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MUSA NCLH

MUSA vs NCLH: by the numbers

•MUSA is the larger company ($10.51B vs $8.73B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.88 vs 17.34 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (7.49% vs 2.87% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (236.47% vs 9.42% CAGR).
•MUSA pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MUSA	NCLH
P/E ratio	17.34	11.88
Forward P/E	16.89	11.96
P/S ratio	0.49	0.87
P/B ratio	13.49	3.43
EV / EBITDA	10.66	9.06
FCF yield	5.13%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MUSA	NCLH
Gross margin	7.26%	31.97%
Operating margin	4.38%	15.09%
Net margin	2.87%	7.49%
ROE	78.86%	29.57%
ROIC	14.97%	8.75%

Dividends

Metric	MUSA	NCLH
Dividend yield	0.43%	N/A
Payout ratio	9.97%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MUSA	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.42%	236.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.97%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.64%	35.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	30.72%	-5.36%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MUSA or NCLH?: NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: MUSA trades at 17.34 and NCLH at 11.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MUSA or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MUSA at a 9.42% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.
Does MUSA or NCLH pay a bigger dividend?: MUSA pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MUSA or NCLH more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — MUSA at 2.87% versus NCLH at 7.49%.
How have MUSA and NCLH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MUSA delivered 22.75% and NCLH delivered -6.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MUSA analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Murphy USA P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio Murphy USA dividend yield Murphy USA ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE Murphy USA operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin Murphy USA revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth Murphy USA free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

Murphy USA & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 16, 2026.