Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: MU is classified in Technology; VRT is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$820.53TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
$269.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MU vs VRT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yMU +1657.0%VRT +2835.1%VRT compounded faster
MU VRT
MU vs VRT: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($926.70B vs $103.54B market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.38 vs 72.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (55.91% vs 14.37% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.33% vs 18.86% CAGR).
- •VRT pays the higher dividend yield (0.08% vs 0.06%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MU | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.38 | 72.26 |
| Forward P/E | 12.29 | 44.34 |
| P/S ratio | 11.42 | 10.40 |
| P/B ratio | 10.23 | 26.57 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02 | 0.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.56 | 48.36 |
| FCF yield | 2.54% | 2.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.79% | 36.16% |
| Operating margin | 26.41% | 18.54% |
| Net margin | 55.91% | 14.37% |
| ROE | 50.11% | 36.71% |
| ROIC | 12.12% | 18.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | 0.08% |
| Payout ratio | 6.93% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 29.33% | 18.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.12% | 79.41% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 172.93% | 41.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 61.54% | 59.88% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MU or VRT?
- MU has the lower trailing P/E: MU trades at 20.38 and VRT at 72.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MU or VRT?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 29.33% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does MU or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- MU yields 0.06% and VRT yields 0.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MU or VRT more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 55.91% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- How have MU and VRT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, MU delivered 50.65% and VRT delivered 59.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldMicron Technology ROEVertiv ROEMicron Technology operating marginVertiv operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthVertiv revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Micron Technology & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.