Which has grown faster, MU or RYCEY?

Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 29.33% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.

Does MU or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?

MU yields 0.05% and RYCEY yields 0.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MU or RYCEY more profitable?

MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 55.91% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.

How have MU and RYCEY total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MU delivered 50.50% and RYCEY delivered 8.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY)

A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: MU is classified in Technology; RYCEY is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Micron Technology, Inc.

$1.10T

$975.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

RYCEY

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

$163.75B

$19.65IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — MU vs RYCEY

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MU +5522.2% (+49.6%/yr)RYCEY +110.5% (+7.7%/yr)MU compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MU RYCEY

MU vs RYCEY: by the numbers

•MU is the larger company ($1.10T vs $163.75B market cap).
•MU converts more revenue to profit (55.91% vs 26.94% net margin).
•MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.33% vs 12.71% CAGR).
•RYCEY pays the higher dividend yield (0.75% vs 0.05%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MU	RYCEY
P/E ratio	22.07	N/A
Forward P/E	6.28	N/A
P/S ratio	12.20	N/A
P/B ratio	10.94	43.29
EV / EBITDA	15.83	N/A
FCF yield	2.38%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MU	RYCEY
Gross margin	39.79%	29.12%
Operating margin	26.41%	16.82%
Net margin	55.91%	26.94%
ROE	50.11%	209.94%
ROIC	44.23%	15.14%

Dividends

Metric	MU	RYCEY
Dividend yield	0.05%	0.75%
Payout ratio	1.20%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MU	RYCEY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	29.33%	12.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	25.98%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	172.93%	26.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	68.65%	68.29%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MU or RYCEY?: Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 29.33% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.
Does MU or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?: MU yields 0.05% and RYCEY yields 0.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MU or RYCEY more profitable?: MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 55.91% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.
How have MU and RYCEY total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MU delivered 50.50% and RYCEY delivered 8.13% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MU analysis Full RYCEY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Micron Technology P/E ratio Micron Technology dividend yield Rolls-Royce dividend yield Micron Technology ROE Rolls-Royce ROE Micron Technology operating margin Rolls-Royce operating margin Micron Technology revenue growth Rolls-Royce revenue growth Micron Technology free cash flow Rolls-Royce free cash flow

Micron Technology & Rolls-Royce appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.