Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)
MU leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$865.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
$134.85TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MU vs PLTR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yMU +1694.4%PLTR +1319.5%MU compounded faster
MU PLTR
MU vs PLTR: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($977.44B vs $309.63B market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.59 vs 149.83 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (55.91% vs 43.67% net margin).
- •PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.11% vs 29.33% CAGR).
- •MU pays a dividend (0.06% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MU or PLTR?
Metric tally: MU 11 · PLTR 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMU(lower P/E)
GrowthPLTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPLTR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MU | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.59● | 149.83 |
| Forward P/E | 11.80● | 92.64 |
| P/S ratio | 10.98● | 66.36 |
| P/B ratio | 9.84● | 41.03 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 1.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.67● | 170.75 |
| FCF yield | 2.64%● | 0.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.79% | 84.07%● |
| Operating margin | 26.41% | 38.13%● |
| Net margin | 55.91%● | 43.67% |
| ROE | 50.11%● | 27.00% |
| ROIC | 12.12% | 17.95%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | — |
| Payout ratio | 6.47% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 29.33% | 34.11%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.12% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 172.93%● | 94.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 63.76%● | 43.48% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MU or PLTR?
- It depends on your goal. value: MU (lower P/E); growth: PLTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PLTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 11 to 4.
- Is MU or PLTR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper: MU trades at a 19.59 P/E and PLTR at 149.83.
- Which has grown faster, MU or PLTR?
- Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — MU at a 29.33% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.
- Does MU or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?
- MU pays a dividend (0.06% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.
- Is MU or PLTR more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 55.91% versus PLTR at 43.67%.
- Which has been the better investment, MU or PLTR?
- Over the past 5-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 51.89% versus PLTR at 43.48%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioPalantir Technologies P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldPalantir Technologies dividend yieldMicron Technology ROEPalantir Technologies ROEMicron Technology operating marginPalantir Technologies operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthPalantir Technologies revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowPalantir Technologies free cash flow
Micron Technology & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.