Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
MU leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though ORCL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Micron Technology, Inc. and Oracle Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — MU vs ORCL
growth of $100 · last 30yMU +6387.8%ORCL +4720.2%MU compounded faster
MU ORCL
MU vs ORCL: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($1.11T vs $529.57B market cap).
- •ORCL trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.58 vs 46.32 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 25.37% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 10.72% CAGR).
- •ORCL pays the higher dividend yield (1.09% vs 0.05%).
Which is better, MU or ORCL?
Metric tally: MU 8 · ORCL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueORCL(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeORCL(higher dividend yield)
QualityMU(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MU | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.32 | 31.58● |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.93 |
| P/S ratio | 19.25 | 7.97● |
| P/B ratio | 15.44 | 12.47● |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 1.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.08 | 20.61● |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | MU | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.44% | 65.81%● |
| Operating margin | 48.52%● | 30.85% |
| Net margin | 41.49%● | 25.37% |
| ROE | 33.28% | 39.69%● |
| ROIC | 12.12%● | 7.99% |
Dividends
| Metric | MU | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | 1.09%● |
| Payout ratio | 6.47% | 33.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MU | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.34%● | 10.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.12%● | 4.93% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 140.90%● | -13.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 66.18%● | 18.89% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MU or ORCL?
- It depends on your goal. value: ORCL (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ORCL (higher dividend yield); quality: MU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 8 to 7.
- Is MU or ORCL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ORCL is cheaper: MU trades at a 46.32 P/E and ORCL at 31.58.
- Which has grown faster, MU or ORCL?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — MU at a 20.34% CAGR versus ORCL at 10.72%.
- Does MU or ORCL pay a bigger dividend?
- MU yields 0.05% and ORCL yields 1.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MU or ORCL more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — MU at 41.49% versus ORCL at 25.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, MU or ORCL?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — MU at 55.52% versus ORCL at 18.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Micron Technology P/E ratioOracle P/E ratioMicron Technology dividend yieldOracle dividend yieldMicron Technology ROEOracle ROEMicron Technology operating marginOracle operating marginMicron Technology revenue growthOracle revenue growthMicron Technology free cash flowOracle free cash flow
Micron Technology & Oracle appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.