MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) vs Rollins, Inc. (ROL)

A side-by-side comparison of MasTec, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnMTZ vs ROL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
MTZ +767.6% (+24.1%/yr)ROL +206.6% (+11.9%/yr)MTZ compounded faster over this window
05001k2kStart $10020182020202220242026$868$307
MTZ ROL

MTZ vs ROL: by the numbers

  • MTZ is the larger company ($17.47B vs $15.63B market cap).
  • ROL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.54 vs 34.69 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • ROL converts more revenue to profit (13.55% vs 3.12% net margin).
  • MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.90% vs 11.34% CAGR).
  • ROL pays a dividend (2.10% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricMTZROL
P/E ratio34.6929.54
Forward P/E23.2928.44
P/S ratio1.083.98
P/B ratio5.0210.93
EV / EBITDA14.6319.28
FCF yield1.40%3.96%

Profitability

MetricMTZROL
Gross margin11.47%50.71%
Operating margin5.79%18.68%
Net margin3.12%13.55%
ROE14.47%37.19%
ROIC10.64%21.18%

Dividends

MetricMTZROL
Dividend yieldN/A2.10%
Payout ratioN/A66.36%

Growth (annualized)

MetricMTZROL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)17.90%11.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)2.94%15.08%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-16.75%9.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)22.03%-0.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTZ or ROL?
ROL has the lower trailing P/E: MTZ trades at 34.69 and ROL at 29.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MTZ or ROL?
Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 17.90% CAGR versus ROL at 11.34%.
Does MTZ or ROL pay a bigger dividend?
ROL pays a dividend (2.10% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MTZ or ROL more profitable?
ROL runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.12% versus ROL at 13.55%.
How have MTZ and ROL total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, MTZ delivered 23.88% and ROL delivered 11.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.