Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTZ or QCOM?

QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: MTZ trades at 58.98 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MTZ or QCOM?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 18.00% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does MTZ or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MTZ or QCOM more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.00% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

How have MTZ and QCOM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MTZ delivered 29.91% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

A side-by-side comparison of MasTec, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: MTZ is classified in Industrials; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

MTZ

MasTec, Inc.

$24.69B

$312.44IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$171.68B

$162.88TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MTZ vs QCOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

MTZ +2931.1%QCOM +11063.6%QCOM compounded faster

MTZ QCOM

MTZ vs QCOM: by the numbers

•QCOM is the larger company ($171.68B vs $24.69B market cap).
•QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.24 vs 58.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 3.00% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.00% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTZ	QCOM
P/E ratio	58.98	18.24
Forward P/E	36.85	15.79
P/S ratio	1.74	4.10
P/B ratio	8.02	6.68
PEG ratio	0.29	3.18
EV / EBITDA	23.91	14.61
FCF yield	0.97%	6.86%

Profitability

Metric	MTZ	QCOM
Gross margin	11.30%	54.80%
Operating margin	5.65%	25.52%
Net margin	3.00%	22.31%
ROE	13.86%	36.38%
ROIC	7.44%	13.15%

Dividends

Metric	MTZ	QCOM
Dividend yield	N/A	2.11%
Payout ratio	N/A	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTZ	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.00%	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.94%	5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-19.53%	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	27.71%	6.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTZ or QCOM?: QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: MTZ trades at 58.98 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MTZ or QCOM?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 18.00% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does MTZ or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MTZ or QCOM more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.00% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
How have MTZ and QCOM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MTZ delivered 29.91% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTZ analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MasTec P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio MasTec dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield MasTec ROE QUALCOMM ROE MasTec operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin MasTec revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth MasTec free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

MasTec & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.