Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTZ or NDSN?

NDSN has the lower trailing P/E: MTZ trades at 42.47 and NDSN at 33.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MTZ or NDSN?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 17.90% CAGR versus NDSN at 5.12%.

Does MTZ or NDSN pay a bigger dividend?

NDSN pays a dividend (0.99% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MTZ or NDSN more profitable?

NDSN runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.12% versus NDSN at 18.63%.

How have MTZ and NDSN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MTZ delivered 24.29% and NDSN delivered 14.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) vs Nordson Corporation (NDSN)

A side-by-side comparison of MasTec, Inc. and Nordson Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MTZ

MasTec, Inc.

$21.38B

$266.26IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

NDSN

Nordson Corporation

$18.51B

$332.24IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — MTZ vs NDSN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MTZ +786.4% (+24.4%/yr)NDSN +269.8% (+14.0%/yr)MTZ compounded faster over this window

MTZ NDSN

MTZ vs NDSN: by the numbers

•MTZ is the larger company ($21.38B vs $18.51B market cap).
•NDSN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.59 vs 42.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NDSN converts more revenue to profit (18.63% vs 3.12% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.90% vs 5.12% CAGR).
•NDSN pays a dividend (0.99% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTZ	NDSN
P/E ratio	42.47	33.59
Forward P/E	28.50	27.94
P/S ratio	1.30	6.25
P/B ratio	6.04	5.69
EV / EBITDA	17.16	21.33
FCF yield	1.17%	3.89%

Profitability

Metric	MTZ	NDSN
Gross margin	11.47%	55.29%
Operating margin	5.79%	26.88%
Net margin	3.12%	18.63%
ROE	14.47%	16.98%
ROIC	10.64%	14.23%

Dividends

Metric	MTZ	NDSN
Dividend yield	N/A	0.99%
Payout ratio	N/A	38.32%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTZ	NDSN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	17.90%	5.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.94%	14.66%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-16.75%	6.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	24.36%	8.86%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTZ or NDSN?: NDSN has the lower trailing P/E: MTZ trades at 42.47 and NDSN at 33.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MTZ or NDSN?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — MTZ at a 17.90% CAGR versus NDSN at 5.12%.
Does MTZ or NDSN pay a bigger dividend?: NDSN pays a dividend (0.99% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MTZ or NDSN more profitable?: NDSN runs the higher net margin — MTZ at 3.12% versus NDSN at 18.63%.
How have MTZ and NDSN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MTZ delivered 24.29% and NDSN delivered 14.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTZ analysis Full NDSN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MasTec P/E ratio Nordson P/E ratio Nordson dividend yield MasTec ROE Nordson ROE MasTec operating margin Nordson operating margin MasTec revenue growth Nordson revenue growth MasTec free cash flow Nordson free cash flow

MasTec & Nordson appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.