Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)
A side-by-side comparison of Vail Resorts, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
$145.43Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
$47.05Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MTN vs RUSHA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMTN +21.3% (+2.0%/yr)RUSHA +619.9% (+21.8%/yr)RUSHA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MTN RUSHA
MTN vs RUSHA: by the numbers
- •RUSHA is the larger company ($5.48B vs $5.18B market cap).
- •RUSHA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.17 vs 35.30 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MTN converts more revenue to profit (5.20% vs 3.67% net margin).
- •MTN grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.25% vs 7.70% CAGR).
- •MTN pays the higher dividend yield (6.37% vs 1.10%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MTN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.30 | 14.17 |
| Forward P/E | 26.12 | 19.08 |
| PEG ratio | 6.25 | 1.37 |
| P/S ratio | 1.83 | 0.76 |
| P/B ratio | 21.55 | 2.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.53 | 12.48 |
| FCF yield | 6.02% | 2.29% |
Profitability
| Metric | MTN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.75% | 18.98% |
| Operating margin | 14.82% | 5.13% |
| Net margin | 5.20% | 3.67% |
| ROE | 61.34% | 11.38% |
| ROIC | 7.01% | 7.17% |
Dividends
| Metric | MTN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.37% | 1.10% |
| Payout ratio | 215.53% | 15.66% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MTN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 7.70% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.43% | 19.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.32% | -22.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -12.89% | 19.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTN or RUSHA?
- RUSHA has the lower trailing P/E: MTN trades at 35.30 and RUSHA at 14.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MTN or RUSHA?
- Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — MTN at a 8.25% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
- Does MTN or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?
- MTN yields 6.37% and RUSHA yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MTN or RUSHA more profitable?
- MTN runs the higher net margin — MTN at 5.20% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
- How have MTN and RUSHA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MTN delivered 1.93% and RUSHA delivered 21.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Vail Resorts P/E ratioRush Enterprises P/E ratioVail Resorts dividend yieldRush Enterprises dividend yieldVail Resorts ROERush Enterprises ROEVail Resorts operating marginRush Enterprises operating marginVail Resorts revenue growthRush Enterprises revenue growthVail Resorts free cash flowRush Enterprises free cash flow
Vail Resorts & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.