Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTN or NCLH?

NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: MTN trades at 32.29 and NCLH at 8.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MTN or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MTN at a 9.70% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.

Does MTN or NCLH pay a bigger dividend?

MTN pays a dividend (6.34% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MTN or NCLH more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — MTN at 6.29% versus NCLH at 7.49%.

How have MTN and NCLH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MTN delivered 1.89% and NCLH delivered -8.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

A side-by-side comparison of Vail Resorts, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MTN

Vail Resorts, Inc.

$4.98B

$139.80Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$6.48B

$14.12Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MTN vs NCLH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MTN +18.4% (+1.7%/yr)NCLH -58.8% (-8.5%/yr)MTN compounded faster over this window

MTN NCLH

MTN vs NCLH: by the numbers

•NCLH is the larger company ($6.48B vs $4.98B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.82 vs 32.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (7.49% vs 6.29% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (236.47% vs 9.70% CAGR).
•MTN pays a dividend (6.34% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTN	NCLH
P/E ratio	32.29	8.82
Forward P/E	22.27	9.13
P/S ratio	1.76	0.64
P/B ratio	9.03	2.52
EV / EBITDA	7.99	8.16
FCF yield	4.77%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	MTN	NCLH
Gross margin	42.78%	31.97%
Operating margin	24.13%	15.09%
Net margin	6.29%	7.49%
ROE	32.27%	29.57%
ROIC	9.74%	8.01%

Dividends

Metric	MTN	NCLH
Dividend yield	6.34%	N/A
Payout ratio	205.08%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTN	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.70%	236.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	25.21%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.51%	35.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-10.39%	-9.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MTN or NCLH?: NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: MTN trades at 32.29 and NCLH at 8.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MTN or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — MTN at a 9.70% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.
Does MTN or NCLH pay a bigger dividend?: MTN pays a dividend (6.34% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MTN or NCLH more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — MTN at 6.29% versus NCLH at 7.49%.
How have MTN and NCLH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MTN delivered 1.89% and NCLH delivered -8.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTN analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Vail Resorts P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio Vail Resorts dividend yield Vail Resorts ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE Vail Resorts operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin Vail Resorts revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth Vail Resorts free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

Vail Resorts & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.