Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) vs Waters Corporation (WAT)
MTD leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and Waters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
$1131.49Healthcare
WAT
Waters Corporation
$355.53Healthcare
Not enough overlapping price history to compare MTD and WAT.
MTD vs WAT: by the numbers
- •WAT is the larger company ($23.17B vs $22.86B market cap).
- •MTD trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.49 vs 45.18 P/E).
- •MTD converts more revenue to profit (21.40% vs 11.91% net margin).
- •WAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.48% vs 4.77% CAGR).
Which is better, MTD or WAT?
Metric tally: MTD 11 · WAT 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMTD(lower P/E)
GrowthWAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMTD(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MTD | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.49● | 45.18 |
| Forward P/E | 22.12 | 21.65● |
| P/S ratio | 5.61● | 7.74 |
| P/B ratio | — | 1.91 |
| PEG ratio | 8.96● | 75.62 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.60● | 37.11 |
| FCF yield | 3.46%● | 0.90% |
Profitability
| Metric | MTD | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.79%● | 55.02% |
| Operating margin | 28.00%● | 17.08% |
| Net margin | 21.40%● | 11.91% |
| ROE | -3677.41% | 2.94%● |
| ROIC | 35.46%● | 17.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MTD | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.77% | 8.48%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.81%● | 5.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.98%● | -17.63% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -3.11% | 1.10%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MTD or WAT?
- It depends on your goal. value: MTD (lower P/E); growth: WAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MTD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTD leads 11 to 4.
- Is MTD or WAT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MTD is cheaper: MTD trades at a 26.49 P/E and WAT at 45.18.
- Which has grown faster, MTD or WAT?
- Over the past five years, WAT grew revenue faster — MTD at a 4.77% CAGR versus WAT at 8.48%.
- Is MTD or WAT more profitable?
- MTD runs the higher net margin — MTD at 21.40% versus WAT at 11.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, MTD or WAT?
- Over the past 10-year, MTD delivered the higher annualized total return — MTD at 11.59% versus WAT at 9.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mettler-Toledo International P/E ratioWaters P/E ratioMettler-Toledo International dividend yieldWaters dividend yieldMettler-Toledo International ROEWaters ROEMettler-Toledo International operating marginWaters operating marginMettler-Toledo International revenue growthWaters revenue growthMettler-Toledo International free cash flowWaters free cash flow
Mettler-Toledo International & Waters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.