Is MTCH or NWSA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NWSA is cheaper: MTCH trades at a 13.69 P/E and NWSA at 13.36.

Which has grown faster, MTCH or NWSA?

Over the past five years, MTCH grew revenue faster — MTCH at a 6.96% CAGR versus NWSA at 0.54%.

Does MTCH or NWSA pay a bigger dividend?

MTCH yields 2.18% and NWSA yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MTCH or NWSA more profitable?

MTCH runs the higher net margin — MTCH at 18.83% versus NWSA at 11.80%.

Which has been the better investment, MTCH or NWSA?

Over the past 10-year, MTCH delivered the higher annualized total return — MTCH at 9.75% versus NWSA at 8.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) vs News Corporation (NWSA)

MTCH leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though NWSA is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Match Group, Inc. and News Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MTCH

Match Group, Inc.

$8.33B

$35.31Communication Services

NWSA

News Corporation

$14.02B

$24.98Communication Services

Total return — MTCH vs NWSA

growth of $100 · last 13y

MTCH +148.8%NWSA +58.1%MTCH compounded faster

MTCH NWSA

MTCH vs NWSA: by the numbers

•NWSA is the larger company ($14.02B vs $8.33B market cap).
•NWSA trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.36 vs 13.69 P/E).
•MTCH converts more revenue to profit (18.83% vs 11.80% net margin).
•MTCH grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.96% vs 0.54% CAGR).
•MTCH pays the higher dividend yield (2.18% vs 0.80%).

Which is better, MTCH or NWSA?

Metric tally: MTCH 8 · NWSA 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNWSA(lower P/E)

GrowthMTCH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMTCH(higher dividend yield)

QualityMTCH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTCH	NWSA
P/E ratio	13.69	13.36●
Forward P/E	11.47●	19.67
P/S ratio	2.63	1.55●
P/B ratio	—	1.63
PEG ratio	0.66	0.04●
EV / EBITDA	11.29	11.30
FCF yield	11.00%●	4.04%

Profitability

Metric	MTCH	NWSA
Gross margin	73.80%	73.90%
Operating margin	26.60%●	12.36%
Net margin	18.83%●	11.80%
ROE	-241.99%	12.41%●
ROIC	18.50%●	5.16%

Dividends

Metric	MTCH	NWSA
Dividend yield	2.18%●	0.80%
Payout ratio	30.43%	9.62%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTCH	NWSA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.96%●	0.54%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.23%	40.52%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	5.49%●	-11.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-25.78%	0.53%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, MTCH or NWSA?: It depends on your goal. value: NWSA (lower P/E); growth: MTCH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MTCH (higher dividend yield); quality: MTCH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTCH leads 8 to 6.
Is MTCH or NWSA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NWSA is cheaper: MTCH trades at a 13.69 P/E and NWSA at 13.36.
Which has grown faster, MTCH or NWSA?: Over the past five years, MTCH grew revenue faster — MTCH at a 6.96% CAGR versus NWSA at 0.54%.
Does MTCH or NWSA pay a bigger dividend?: MTCH yields 2.18% and NWSA yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MTCH or NWSA more profitable?: MTCH runs the higher net margin — MTCH at 18.83% versus NWSA at 11.80%.
Which has been the better investment, MTCH or NWSA?: Over the past 10-year, MTCH delivered the higher annualized total return — MTCH at 9.75% versus NWSA at 8.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTCH analysis Full NWSA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Match P/E ratio News P/E ratio Match dividend yield News dividend yield Match ROE News ROE Match operating margin News operating margin Match revenue growth News revenue growth Match free cash flow News free cash flow

Match & News appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.