Which has grown faster, MTB or SLV?

Over the past five years, SLV grew revenue faster — MTB at a 15.23% CAGR versus SLV at 16.06%.

Does MTB or SLV pay a bigger dividend?

MTB pays a dividend (2.45% yield), while SLV has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MTB or SLV more profitable?

MTB runs the higher net margin — MTB at 24.40% versus SLV at 0.00%.

How have MTB and SLV total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MTB delivered 10.71% and SLV delivered 12.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) vs iShares Silver Trust (SLV)

A side-by-side comparison of M&T Bank Corporation and iShares Silver Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MTB

M&T Bank Corporation

$34.99B

$241.41Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 20, 2026, 2:34 PM EDT

SLV

iShares Silver Trust

$33.05B

$61.41Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 20, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT

Total return — MTB vs SLV

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MTB +177.3% (+10.7%/yr)SLV +234.7% (+12.8%/yr)SLV compounded faster over this window

MTB SLV

MTB vs SLV: by the numbers

•MTB is the larger company ($34.99B vs $33.05B market cap).
•MTB is profitable (24.40% net margin) while SLV runs a net loss (0.00%).
•SLV grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.06% vs 15.23% CAGR).
•MTB pays a dividend (2.45% yield), while SLV has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MTB	SLV
P/E ratio	12.90	N/A
Forward P/E	12.67	16.95
P/S ratio	3.08	N/A
P/B ratio	1.37	1.20

Profitability

Metric	MTB	SLV
Gross margin	76.03%	0.00%
Operating margin	33.19%	0.00%
Net margin	24.40%	0.00%
ROE	10.85%	-0.02%

Dividends

Metric	MTB	SLV
Dividend yield	2.45%	N/A
Payout ratio	35.09%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MTB	SLV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.23%	16.06%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%	432.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.31%	22.78%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MTB or SLV?: Over the past five years, SLV grew revenue faster — MTB at a 15.23% CAGR versus SLV at 16.06%.
Does MTB or SLV pay a bigger dividend?: MTB pays a dividend (2.45% yield), while SLV has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MTB or SLV more profitable?: MTB runs the higher net margin — MTB at 24.40% versus SLV at 0.00%.
How have MTB and SLV total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MTB delivered 10.71% and SLV delivered 12.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MTB analysis Full SLV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

M&T Bank P/E ratio M&T Bank dividend yield M&T Bank ROE iShares Silver ROE M&T Bank operating margin iShares Silver operating margin M&T Bank revenue growth iShares Silver revenue growth

M&T Bank & iShares Silver appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.