Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
MSFT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though QCOM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Microsoft Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — MSFT vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yMSFT +4981.1%QCOM +7028.6%QCOM compounded faster
MSFT QCOM
MSFT vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •MSFT is the larger company ($2.90T vs $223.15B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 23.26 P/E).
- •MSFT converts more revenue to profit (39.34% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •MSFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.75% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.91%).
Which is better, MSFT or QCOM?
Metric tally: MSFT 9 · QCOM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthMSFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityMSFT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MSFT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.26 | 22.72● |
| Forward P/E | 20.12 | 19.72 |
| P/S ratio | 9.14 | 5.10● |
| P/B ratio | 7.02● | 8.32 |
| PEG ratio | 2.34● | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.60● | 16.71 |
| FCF yield | 2.51% | 5.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MSFT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.31%● | 54.80% |
| Operating margin | 46.80%● | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 39.34%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | 30.22% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 21.63%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | MSFT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.70%● |
| Payout ratio | 25.99% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MSFT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.75%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.68%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.27% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.56% | 11.87%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MSFT or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: MSFT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: MSFT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSFT leads 9 to 7.
- Is MSFT or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: MSFT trades at a 23.26 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, MSFT or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, MSFT grew revenue faster — MSFT at a 14.75% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does MSFT or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- MSFT yields 0.91% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MSFT or QCOM more profitable?
- MSFT runs the higher net margin — MSFT at 39.34% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, MSFT or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, MSFT delivered the higher annualized total return — MSFT at 23.98% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Microsoft P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioMicrosoft dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldMicrosoft ROEQUALCOMM ROEMicrosoft operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginMicrosoft revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthMicrosoft free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Microsoft & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.