Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Marvell Technology, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
$279.70Technology
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$211.72Technology
Not enough overlapping price history to compare MRVL and QCOM.
MRVL vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •MRVL is the larger company ($244.68B vs $223.15B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 96.16 P/E).
- •MRVL converts more revenue to profit (28.99% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •MRVL grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.90% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, MRVL or QCOM?
Metric tally: MRVL 4 · QCOM 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthMRVL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MRVL | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 96.16 | 22.72● |
| Forward P/E | 45.62 | 19.72● |
| P/S ratio | 28.66 | 5.10● |
| P/B ratio | 13.72 | 8.32● |
| PEG ratio | 21.37 | 3.96● |
| EV / EBITDA | 54.51 | 17.18● |
| FCF yield | 0.67% | 5.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MRVL | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.64% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 16.20% | 25.52%● |
| Net margin | 28.99%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | 13.87% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 5.98% | 13.15%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MRVL | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 1.70%● |
| Payout ratio | 7.74% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MRVL | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.90%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.50% | 5.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 26.05%● | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 40.47%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MRVL or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: MRVL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 13 to 4.
- Is MRVL or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: MRVL trades at a 96.16 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, MRVL or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, MRVL grew revenue faster — MRVL at a 22.90% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does MRVL or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- MRVL yields 0.09% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MRVL or QCOM more profitable?
- MRVL runs the higher net margin — MRVL at 28.99% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, MRVL or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, MRVL delivered the higher annualized total return — MRVL at 40.79% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Marvell Technology P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioMarvell Technology dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldMarvell Technology ROEQUALCOMM ROEMarvell Technology operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginMarvell Technology revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthMarvell Technology free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Marvell Technology & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.