Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) vs The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV)
TRV leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and The Travelers Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$164.22Financial Services
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
$306.07Financial Services
Total return — MRSH vs TRV
growth of $100 · last 30yMRSH +931.5%TRV +1055.0%TRV compounded faster
MRSH TRV
MRSH vs TRV: by the numbers
- •MRSH is the larger company ($79.12B vs $65.08B market cap).
- •TRV trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.11 vs 20.53 P/E).
- •TRV converts more revenue to profit (15.54% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •MRSH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 8.61% CAGR).
- •MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (2.19% vs 1.49%).
Which is better, MRSH or TRV?
Metric tally: MRSH 4 · TRV 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRV(lower P/E)
GrowthMRSH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMRSH(higher dividend yield)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MRSH | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.53 | 9.11● |
| Forward P/E | 15.79 | 10.89● |
| P/S ratio | 2.90 | 1.37● |
| P/B ratio | 5.48 | 2.09● |
| PEG ratio | 7.79 | 0.37● |
Profitability
| Metric | MRSH | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 42.37% | 44.02%● |
| Operating margin | 21.70%● | 19.30% |
| Net margin | 14.26% | 15.54%● |
| ROE | 26.94%● | 23.77% |
| ROIC | 12.12% | 12.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | MRSH | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.19%● | 1.49% |
| Payout ratio | 42.45% | 16.34% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MRSH | TRV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.28%● | 8.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.34% | 21.40%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.30% | 17.77%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MRSH or TRV?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRV (lower P/E); growth: MRSH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRSH (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, TRV leads 9 to 4.
- Is MRSH or TRV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRV is cheaper: MRSH trades at a 20.53 P/E and TRV at 9.11.
- Which has grown faster, MRSH or TRV?
- Over the past five years, MRSH grew revenue faster — MRSH at a 9.28% CAGR versus TRV at 8.61%.
- Does MRSH or TRV pay a bigger dividend?
- MRSH yields 2.19% and TRV yields 1.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MRSH or TRV more profitable?
- TRV runs the higher net margin — MRSH at 14.26% versus TRV at 15.54%.
- Which has been the better investment, MRSH or TRV?
- Over the past 10-year, TRV delivered the higher annualized total return — MRSH at 11.42% versus TRV at 13.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Marsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioTravelers Companies P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldTravelers Companies dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies ROETravelers Companies ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginTravelers Companies operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthTravelers Companies revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flowTravelers Companies free cash flow
Marsh & McLennan Companies & Travelers Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.