Merlin, Inc. (MRLN) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
A side-by-side comparison of Merlin, Inc. and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MRLN
Merlin, Inc.
$1.57IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:20 PM EDT
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
$2.89IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:19 PM EDT
Total return — MRLN vs TUSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMRLN -85.0% (-85.0%/yr)TUSK +14.5% (+14.5%/yr)TUSK compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MRLN TUSK
MRLN vs TUSK: by the numbers
- •MRLN is the larger company ($151M vs $139M market cap).
- •TUSK is profitable (1.23% net margin) while MRLN runs a net loss (-4617.12%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MRLN | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 195.27 |
| P/S ratio | 47.39 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 0.53 |
Profitability
| Metric | MRLN | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.00% | -19.33% |
| Operating margin | 0.00% | -63.52% |
| Net margin | -4617.12% | 1.23% |
| ROE | -235.84% | 0.28% |
| ROIC | -33.08% | -8.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MRLN | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -25.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -2.17% |
Frequently asked
- Is MRLN or TUSK more profitable?
- TUSK runs the higher net margin — MRLN at -4617.12% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.