Which has the lower trailing P/E, MQ or PRGS?

PRGS has the lower trailing P/E: MQ trades at 170.27 and PRGS at 17.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MQ or PRGS?

Over the past five years, PRGS grew revenue faster — MQ at a 10.95% CAGR versus PRGS at 14.26%.

Is MQ or PRGS more profitable?

PRGS runs the higher net margin — MQ at 1.53% versus PRGS at 9.24%.

How have MQ and PRGS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, MQ delivered -27.24% and PRGS delivered -4.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) vs Progress Software Corporation (PRGS)

A side-by-side comparison of Marqeta, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Marqeta, Inc.

$1.62B

$16.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PRGS

Progress Software Corporation

$1.53B

$37.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MQ vs PRGS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

MQ -86.1% (-32.6%/yr)PRGS -16.8% (-3.6%/yr)PRGS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MQ PRGS

MQ vs PRGS: by the numbers

•MQ is the larger company ($1.62B vs $1.53B market cap).
•PRGS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.14 vs 170.27 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PRGS converts more revenue to profit (9.24% vs 1.53% net margin).
•PRGS grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.26% vs 10.95% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MQ	PRGS
P/E ratio	170.27	17.14
Forward P/E	74.51	6.01
P/S ratio	2.39	1.53
P/B ratio	2.26	2.88
EV / EBITDA	21.65	8.77
FCF yield	10.54%	20.92%

Profitability

Metric	MQ	PRGS
Gross margin	11.15%	79.66%
Operating margin	-1.68%	18.13%
Net margin	1.53%	9.24%
ROE	1.45%	17.44%
ROIC	-1.42%	7.97%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MQ	PRGS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.95%	14.26%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-0.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.07%	13.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-27.24%	-4.90%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MQ or PRGS?: PRGS has the lower trailing P/E: MQ trades at 170.27 and PRGS at 17.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MQ or PRGS?: Over the past five years, PRGS grew revenue faster — MQ at a 10.95% CAGR versus PRGS at 14.26%.
Is MQ or PRGS more profitable?: PRGS runs the higher net margin — MQ at 1.53% versus PRGS at 9.24%.
How have MQ and PRGS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, MQ delivered -27.24% and PRGS delivered -4.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MQ analysis Full PRGS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Marqeta P/E ratio Progress Software P/E ratio Marqeta ROE Progress Software ROE Marqeta operating margin Progress Software operating margin Marqeta revenue growth Progress Software revenue growth Marqeta free cash flow Progress Software free cash flow

Marqeta & Progress Software appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.