Is MPWR or TER cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TER is cheaper: MPWR trades at a 113.72 P/E and TER at 74.67.

Which has grown faster, MPWR or TER?

Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.95% CAGR versus TER at 3.76%.

Does MPWR or TER pay a bigger dividend?

MPWR yields 0.42% and TER yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MPWR or TER more profitable?

MPWR runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 22.84% versus TER at 22.55%.

Which has been the better investment, MPWR or TER?

Over the past 10-year, MPWR delivered the higher annualized total return — MPWR at 37.85% versus TER at 35.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)

TER leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MPWR

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Total return — MPWR vs TER

growth of $100 · last 22y

MPWR +15929.7%TER +2138.8%MPWR compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MPWR TER

MPWR vs TER: by the numbers

•MPWR is the larger company ($77.49B vs $63.12B market cap).
•TER trades at the lower earnings multiple (74.67 vs 113.72 P/E).
•MPWR converts more revenue to profit (22.84% vs 22.55% net margin).
•MPWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.95% vs 3.76% CAGR).
•MPWR pays the higher dividend yield (0.42% vs 0.12%).

Which is better, MPWR or TER?

Metric tally: MPWR 7 · TER 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTER(lower P/E)

GrowthMPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTER(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MPWR	TER
P/E ratio	113.72	74.67●
Forward P/E	52.57●	54.71
P/S ratio	26.27	16.78●
P/B ratio	21.12	20.22●
PEG ratio	4.00●	23.29
EV / EBITDA	87.05	57.36●
FCF yield	0.81%	0.87%●

Profitability

Metric	MPWR	TER
Gross margin	55.18%	58.79%●
Operating margin	27.09%	26.92%
Net margin	22.84%	22.55%
ROE	18.37%	27.17%●
ROIC	15.30%	18.45%●

Dividends

Metric	MPWR	TER
Dividend yield	0.42%●	0.12%
Payout ratio	52.11%	14.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MPWR	TER
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	25.95%●	3.76%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.43%●	-5.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.36%●	-3.97%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.32%●	26.28%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MPWR or TER?: It depends on your goal. value: TER (lower P/E); growth: MPWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TER leads 8 to 7.
Is MPWR or TER cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TER is cheaper: MPWR trades at a 113.72 P/E and TER at 74.67.
Which has grown faster, MPWR or TER?: Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.95% CAGR versus TER at 3.76%.
Does MPWR or TER pay a bigger dividend?: MPWR yields 0.42% and TER yields 0.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MPWR or TER more profitable?: MPWR runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 22.84% versus TER at 22.55%.
Which has been the better investment, MPWR or TER?: Over the past 10-year, MPWR delivered the higher annualized total return — MPWR at 37.85% versus TER at 35.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MPWR analysis Full TER analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monolithic Power Systems P/E ratio Teradyne P/E ratio Monolithic Power Systems dividend yield Teradyne dividend yield Monolithic Power Systems ROE Teradyne ROE Monolithic Power Systems operating margin Teradyne operating margin Monolithic Power Systems revenue growth Teradyne revenue growth Monolithic Power Systems free cash flow Teradyne free cash flow

Monolithic Power Systems & Teradyne appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.