Which has the lower trailing P/E, MPWR or TER?

TER has the lower trailing P/E: MPWR trades at 70.05 and TER at 45.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MPWR or TER?

Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.77% CAGR versus TER at 6.58%.

Does MPWR or TER pay a bigger dividend?

MPWR yields 0.58% and TER yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is MPWR or TER more profitable?

TER runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 24.41% versus TER at 25.77%.

How have MPWR and TER total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MPWR delivered 33.67% and TER delivered 34.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)

A side-by-side comparison of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MPWR

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

$56.17B

$1,143.24TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TER

Teradyne, Inc.

$51.47B

$329.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MPWR vs TER

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MPWR +1671.9% (+33.3%/yr)TER +1851.9% (+34.6%/yr)TER compounded faster over this window

MPWR TER

MPWR vs TER: by the numbers

•MPWR is the larger company ($56.17B vs $51.47B market cap).
•TER trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (45.16 vs 70.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TER converts more revenue to profit (25.77% vs 24.41% net margin).
•MPWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.77% vs 6.58% CAGR).
•MPWR pays the higher dividend yield (0.58% vs 0.13%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MPWR	TER
P/E ratio	70.05	45.16
Forward P/E	41.69	35.76
P/S ratio	17.16	11.53
P/B ratio	14.42	14.97
EV / EBITDA	55.18	34.90
FCF yield	1.04%	1.55%

Profitability

Metric	MPWR	TER
Gross margin	55.20%	59.31%
Operating margin	28.72%	21.74%
Net margin	24.41%	25.77%
ROE	20.51%	33.46%
ROIC	18.22%	30.79%

Dividends

Metric	MPWR	TER
Dividend yield	0.58%	0.13%
Payout ratio	43.63%	6.86%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MPWR	TER
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	25.77%	6.58%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.43%	-5.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.36%	-8.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.96%	26.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MPWR or TER?: TER has the lower trailing P/E: MPWR trades at 70.05 and TER at 45.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MPWR or TER?: Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.77% CAGR versus TER at 6.58%.
Does MPWR or TER pay a bigger dividend?: MPWR yields 0.58% and TER yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is MPWR or TER more profitable?: TER runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 24.41% versus TER at 25.77%.
How have MPWR and TER total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MPWR delivered 33.67% and TER delivered 34.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MPWR analysis Full TER analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monolithic Power Systems P/E ratio Teradyne P/E ratio Monolithic Power Systems dividend yield Teradyne dividend yield Monolithic Power Systems ROE Teradyne ROE Monolithic Power Systems operating margin Teradyne operating margin Monolithic Power Systems revenue growth Teradyne revenue growth Monolithic Power Systems free cash flow Teradyne free cash flow

Monolithic Power Systems & Teradyne appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.