Which has the lower trailing P/E, MPWR or SNPS?

SNPS has the lower trailing P/E: MPWR trades at 92.43 and SNPS at 87.65. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MPWR or SNPS?

Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.95% CAGR versus SNPS at 16.85%.

Does MPWR or SNPS pay a bigger dividend?

MPWR pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while SNPS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MPWR or SNPS more profitable?

MPWR runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 22.84% versus SNPS at 8.91%.

How have MPWR and SNPS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MPWR delivered 34.23% and SNPS delivered 21.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) vs Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS)

A side-by-side comparison of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MPWR

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

$62.23B

$1,266.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT

SNPS

Synopsys, Inc.

$72.25B

$377.33TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT

Total return — MPWR vs SNPS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 22y

MPWR +14473.4%SNPS +2152.5%MPWR compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MPWR SNPS

MPWR vs SNPS: by the numbers

•SNPS is the larger company ($72.25B vs $62.23B market cap).
•SNPS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (87.65 vs 92.43 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MPWR converts more revenue to profit (22.84% vs 8.91% net margin).
•MPWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.95% vs 16.85% CAGR).
•MPWR pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while SNPS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MPWR	SNPS
P/E ratio	92.43	87.65
Forward P/E	53.05	25.96
P/S ratio	21.35	8.47
P/B ratio	17.17	2.41
PEG ratio	3.25	6.71
EV / EBITDA	72.45	41.10
FCF yield	0.99%	3.64%

Profitability

Metric	MPWR	SNPS
Gross margin	55.18%	73.47%
Operating margin	27.09%	8.36%
Net margin	22.84%	8.91%
ROE	18.37%	2.54%
ROIC	15.30%	1.97%

Dividends

Metric	MPWR	SNPS
Dividend yield	0.56%	N/A
Payout ratio	55.54%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MPWR	SNPS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	25.95%	16.85%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.43%	13.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.36%	17.78%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.26%	6.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MPWR or SNPS?: SNPS has the lower trailing P/E: MPWR trades at 92.43 and SNPS at 87.65. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MPWR or SNPS?: Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.95% CAGR versus SNPS at 16.85%.
Does MPWR or SNPS pay a bigger dividend?: MPWR pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while SNPS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MPWR or SNPS more profitable?: MPWR runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 22.84% versus SNPS at 8.91%.
How have MPWR and SNPS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MPWR delivered 34.23% and SNPS delivered 21.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MPWR analysis Full SNPS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monolithic Power Systems P/E ratio Synopsys P/E ratio Monolithic Power Systems dividend yield Synopsys dividend yield Monolithic Power Systems ROE Synopsys ROE Monolithic Power Systems operating margin Synopsys operating margin Monolithic Power Systems revenue growth Synopsys revenue growth Monolithic Power Systems free cash flow Synopsys free cash flow

Monolithic Power Systems & Synopsys appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.