Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) vs NetEase, Inc. (NTES)
A side-by-side comparison of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and NetEase, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
$1,439.73TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
$117.21TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MPWR vs NTES
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMPWR +1873.0% (+34.7%/yr)NTES +185.1% (+11.0%/yr)MPWR compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MPWR NTES
MPWR vs NTES: by the numbers
- •NTES is the larger company ($74.83B vs $70.73B market cap).
- •NTES trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.23 vs 88.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NTES converts more revenue to profit (27.87% vs 24.41% net margin).
- •MPWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.77% vs 6.78% CAGR).
- •NTES pays the higher dividend yield (2.50% vs 0.49%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MPWR | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 88.22 | 16.23 |
| Forward P/E | 52.50 | N/A |
| PEG ratio | 2.99 | 0.74 |
| P/S ratio | 21.61 | 4.46 |
| P/B ratio | 18.16 | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 69.75 | 11.65 |
| FCF yield | 0.83% | 9.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | MPWR | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.20% | 67.20% |
| Operating margin | 28.72% | 35.32% |
| Net margin | 24.41% | 27.87% |
| ROE | 20.51% | 19.00% |
| ROIC | 18.22% | 17.31% |
Dividends
| Metric | MPWR | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 2.50% |
| Payout ratio | 43.63% | 40.58% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MPWR | NTES |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 25.77% | 6.78% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.43% | 22.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.36% | 18.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.30% | 9.30% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MPWR or NTES?
- NTES has the lower trailing P/E: MPWR trades at 88.22 and NTES at 16.23. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MPWR or NTES?
- Over the past five years, MPWR grew revenue faster — MPWR at a 25.77% CAGR versus NTES at 6.78%.
- Does MPWR or NTES pay a bigger dividend?
- MPWR yields 0.49% and NTES yields 2.50% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MPWR or NTES more profitable?
- NTES runs the higher net margin — MPWR at 24.41% versus NTES at 27.87%.
- How have MPWR and NTES total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MPWR delivered 34.49% and NTES delivered 11.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monolithic Power Systems P/E ratioNetEase P/E ratioMonolithic Power Systems dividend yieldNetEase dividend yieldMonolithic Power Systems ROENetEase ROEMonolithic Power Systems operating marginNetEase operating marginMonolithic Power Systems revenue growthNetEase revenue growthMonolithic Power Systems free cash flowNetEase free cash flow
Monolithic Power Systems & NetEase appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.