Which has grown faster, MP or RPM?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus RPM at 5.79%.

Does MP or RPM pay a bigger dividend?

RPM pays a dividend (2.09% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is MP or RPM more profitable?

RPM runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus RPM at 8.63%.

Which has been the better investment, MP or RPM?

Over the past 5-year, RPM delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 7.62% versus RPM at 9.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

MP Materials Corp. (MP) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)

RPM leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of MP Materials Corp. and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MP Materials Corp.

$9.21B

$51.71Basic Materials

RPM

RPM International Inc.

$13.19B

$103.36Basic Materials

Total return — MP vs RPM

growth of $100 · last 6y

MP +430.0%RPM +37.2%MP compounded faster

MP RPM

MP vs RPM: by the numbers

•RPM is the larger company ($13.19B vs $9.21B market cap).
•RPM is profitable (8.63% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 5.79% CAGR).
•RPM pays a dividend (2.09% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, MP or RPM?

Metric tally: MP 2 · RPM 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRPM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MP	RPM
P/E ratio	—	19.92
Forward P/E	302.32	18.79●
P/S ratio	30.38	1.71●
P/B ratio	4.44	4.19●
PEG ratio	—	1.21
EV / EBITDA	—	13.93
FCF yield	—	4.36%

Profitability

Metric	MP	RPM
Gross margin	-2.40%	41.36%●
Operating margin	-39.42%	11.99%●
Net margin	-20.48%	8.63%●
ROE	-2.99%	21.16%●
ROIC	-2.36%	12.50%●

Dividends

Metric	MP	RPM
Dividend yield	—	2.09%
Payout ratio	—	40.15%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MP	RPM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.90%●	5.79%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	18.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	-3.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.62%●	4.59%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MP or RPM?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RPM leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, MP or RPM?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — MP at a 14.90% CAGR versus RPM at 5.79%.
Does MP or RPM pay a bigger dividend?: RPM pays a dividend (2.09% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is MP or RPM more profitable?: RPM runs the higher net margin — MP at -20.48% versus RPM at 8.63%.
Which has been the better investment, MP or RPM?: Over the past 5-year, RPM delivered the higher annualized total return — MP at 7.62% versus RPM at 9.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MP analysis Full RPM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

MP Materials P/E ratio RPM International P/E ratio MP Materials dividend yield RPM International dividend yield MP Materials ROE RPM International ROE MP Materials operating margin RPM International operating margin MP Materials revenue growth RPM International revenue growth MP Materials free cash flow RPM International free cash flow

MP Materials & RPM International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.