Which has the lower trailing P/E, MOH or UHS?

UHS has the lower trailing P/E: MOH trades at 1056.84 and UHS at 6.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MOH or UHS?

Over the past five years, MOH grew revenue faster — MOH at a 13.56% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.

Does MOH or UHS pay a bigger dividend?

UHS pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while MOH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is MOH or UHS more profitable?

UHS runs the higher net margin — MOH at -0.02% versus UHS at 8.42%.

How have MOH and UHS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MOH delivered 13.75% and UHS delivered 3.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)

A side-by-side comparison of Molina Healthcare, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MOH

Molina Healthcare, Inc.

$10.48B

$200.80HealthcareAt close: Sep 4, 2026 (market close, ET)

UHS

Universal Health Services, Inc.

$10.27B

$169.65HealthcareAt close: Sep 4, 2026 (market close, ET)

Total return — MOH vs UHS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MOH +265.1% (+13.8%/yr)UHS +47.0% (+3.9%/yr)MOH compounded faster over this window

MOH UHS

MOH vs UHS: by the numbers

•MOH is the larger company ($10.48B vs $10.27B market cap).
•UHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.96 vs 1056.84 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UHS is profitable (8.42% net margin) while MOH runs a net loss (-0.02%).
•MOH grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.56% vs 8.21% CAGR).
•UHS pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while MOH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MOH	UHS
P/E ratio	1056.84	6.96
Forward P/E	N/A	7.53
P/S ratio	0.23	0.56
P/B ratio	2.47	1.35
EV / EBITDA	19.98	5.66
FCF yield	2.63%	8.13%

Profitability

Metric	MOH	UHS
Gross margin	13.07%	90.69%
Operating margin	0.66%	11.36%
Net margin	-0.02%	8.42%
ROE	-0.17%	20.31%
ROIC	3.56%	11.74%

Dividends

Metric	MOH	UHS
Dividend yield	N/A	0.47%
Payout ratio	N/A	3.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MOH	UHS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.56%	8.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-4.78%	16.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-33.88%	-12.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-6.08%	2.19%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MOH or UHS?: UHS has the lower trailing P/E: MOH trades at 1056.84 and UHS at 6.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MOH or UHS?: Over the past five years, MOH grew revenue faster — MOH at a 13.56% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
Does MOH or UHS pay a bigger dividend?: UHS pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while MOH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is MOH or UHS more profitable?: UHS runs the higher net margin — MOH at -0.02% versus UHS at 8.42%.
How have MOH and UHS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MOH delivered 13.75% and UHS delivered 3.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MOH analysis Full UHS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Molina Healthcare P/E ratio Universal Health Services P/E ratio Universal Health Services dividend yield Molina Healthcare ROE Universal Health Services ROE Molina Healthcare operating margin Universal Health Services operating margin Molina Healthcare revenue growth Universal Health Services revenue growth Molina Healthcare free cash flow Universal Health Services free cash flow

Molina Healthcare & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 6, 2026.