Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UHS leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Molina Healthcare, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
$200.29HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 23, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$151.27HealthcareAt close: Jul 23, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — MOH vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 23yMOH +1432.1%UHS +749.0%MOH compounded faster
MOH UHS
MOH vs UHS: by the numbers
- •MOH is the larger company ($10.44B vs $9.47B market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower earnings multiple (6.35 vs 1167.05 P/E).
- •UHS is profitable (8.56% net margin) while MOH runs a net loss (-0.02%).
- •MOH grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.56% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.53% yield) while MOH does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MOH or UHS?
Metric tally: MOH 2 · UHS 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUHS(lower P/E)
GrowthMOH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityUHS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MOH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 1167.05 | 6.35● |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.45 |
| P/S ratio | 0.26● | 0.53 |
| P/B ratio | 2.73 | 1.24● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.29 | 5.38● |
| FCF yield | 2.38% | 9.58%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MOH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 13.07% | 90.45%● |
| Operating margin | 0.66% | 11.50%● |
| Net margin | -0.02% | 8.56%● |
| ROE | -0.17% | 20.19%● |
| ROIC | 7.64% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | MOH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.53% |
| Payout ratio | — | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MOH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.56%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -4.78% | 16.19%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -33.88% | -4.64%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.80% | 0.34%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MOH or UHS?
- It depends on your goal. value: UHS (lower P/E); growth: MOH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 12 to 2.
- Is MOH or UHS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UHS is cheaper: MOH trades at a 1167.05 P/E and UHS at 6.35.
- Which has grown faster, MOH or UHS?
- Over the past five years, MOH grew revenue faster — MOH at a 13.56% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does MOH or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.53% yield) while MOH does not currently pay one.
- Is MOH or UHS more profitable?
- UHS runs the higher net margin — MOH at -0.02% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, MOH or UHS?
- Over the past 10-year, MOH delivered the higher annualized total return — MOH at 14.43% versus UHS at 1.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Molina Healthcare P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioMolina Healthcare dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldMolina Healthcare ROEUniversal Health Services ROEMolina Healthcare operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginMolina Healthcare revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthMolina Healthcare free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Molina Healthcare & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 23, 2026.